Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33218060›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Deep Neural Frameworks Improve the Accuracy of General Practitioners in the Classification of Pigmented Skin Lesions.

Maximiliano Lucius, Jorge De All, José Antonio De All, Martín Belvisi, Luciana Radizza, Marisa Lanfranconi, Victoria Lorenzatti, Carlos M Galmarini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. AI and Primary Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maximiliano LuciusTopazium Artificial Intelligence, Paseo de la Castellana 40 Pl 8, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Jorge De AllSanatorio Otamendi, C1115AAB Buenos Aires, Argentina.
José Antonio De AllSanatorio Otamendi, C1115AAB Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Martín BelvisiTopazium Artificial Intelligence, Paseo de la Castellana 40 Pl 8, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Luciana RadizzaInstituto de Obra Social de las Fuerzas Armadas, C1115AAB Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Marisa LanfranconiSanatorio Otamendi, C1115AAB Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Victoria LorenzattiSanatorio Otamendi, C1115AAB Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Carlos M GalmariniTopazium Artificial Intelligence, Paseo de la Castellana 40 Pl 8, 28046 Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated whether deep learning frameworks trained in large datasets can help non-dermatologist physicians improve their accuracy in categorizing the seven most common pigmented skin lesions. Open-source skin images were downloaded from the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC) archive. Different deep neural networks (DNNs) (

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningdermatologymelanomaskin diseases

Identifiers

PMID33218060
PMCPMC7698907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.