ReviewMethods and protocols2020
CRISPR-Based Editing Techniques for Genetic Manipulation of Primary T Cells.
Review in Methods and protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- CRISPR/Cas9 Technology for Modifying Immune Checkpoint in CAR-T Cell Therapy for Hematopoietic Malignancies.Current gene therapy · 2026Review
- Metabolic engineering for optimized CAR-T cell therapy.Nature metabolism · 2024Review
- A high-throughput two-cell assay for interrogating inhibitory signaling pathways in T cells.Life science alliance · 2024Article
- Increasing Gene Editing Efficiency via CRISPR/Cas9- or Cas12a-Mediated Knock-In in Primary Human T Cells.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Killing two birds with one stone: CRISPR/Cas9 CCR5 knockout hematopoietic stem cells transplantation to treat patients with HIV infection and hematological malignancies concurrently.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2023Review
- Scalable continuous-flow electroporation platform enabling T cell transfection for cellular therapy manufacturing.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Innovative Strategies of Reprogramming Immune System Cells by Targeting CRISPR/Cas9-Based Genome-Editing Tools: A New Era of Cancer Management.International journal of nanomedicine · 2023Review
- The current state and future of T-cell exhaustion research.Oxford open immunology · 2023Review
- Cas-CLOVER is a novel high-fidelity nuclease for safe and robust generation of TMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2022Article
- Challenges of CRISPR-Based Gene Editing in Primary T Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
While clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-based genome editing techniques have been widely adapted for use in immortalised immune cells, efficient manipulation of primary T cells has proved to be more challenging. Nonetheless, the rapid expansion of the CRISPR toolbox accompanied by the development of techniques for delivery of CRISPR components into primary T cells now affords the possibility to genetically manipulate primary T cells both with precision and at scale. Here, we review the key features of the techniques for primary T cell editing and discuss how the new generation of CRISPR-based tools may advance genetic engineering of these immune cells. This improved ability to genetically manipulate primary T cells will further enhance our fundamental understanding of cellular signalling and transcriptional networks in T cells and more importantly has the potential to revolutionise T cell-based therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.