ArticleMedicine2020
Endovascular treatment of cerebrovascular stenosis with stent for patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Silencing lncRNA GABPB1-AS1 alleviates cerebral ischemia reperfusion injury through the miR-641/NUCKS1 axis.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- Analysis of the expression levels of chemerin, ox-LDL, MMP-9, and PAPP-A in ICVD patients and their relationship with the severity of neurological impairment.Brain and behavior · 2022Article
- Effects of chemerin and homocysteine levels and their associations with occurrence and development of ischemic cerebrovascular disease.Lipids in health and disease · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the therapeutic effect of cerebrovascular stent implantation in southwest Chinese patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease and underlying risk factors for stent restenosis.We made a retrospectively analysis of occurring risk, cerebrovascular lesion, stent implantation, complication treatment, and prognosis of 54 patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease in our department.A total of 85 stents were implanted into 54 patients, involving 44 of the internal carotid artery system, 34 of the vertebral-basal artery system and 7 of the subclavian artery system. All patients with stenosis were reduced by >70%, with all stenosis complete reduction in 5 (9%) patients and reduction of over 90% in 25 (46%) patients. A total of 50 patients were followed up for 28.5 (21-35) months. The stents in 42 patients exhibited satisfactory shape and location while restenosis occurred in 8 patients. Univariate analysis revealed that hyperlipidemia, hyperuricemia, surgery duration, and total length of hospital stay are significantly correlated with stent restenosis, and hyperlipidemia and hyperuricemia were proven to be independent risk factors for restenosis using logistic regression analysis.Cerebrovascular stent implantation and balloon inflation surgery can assist in abating angiostenosis and improving blood supplement effectively in patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease. Besides, an overall evaluation, strict care, and regular check-up in perioperative period may reduce the occurrence of complications. Finally, several clinical parameters may need to be highly focused on in surgery for better prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.