ArticleMedicine2020
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of traditional Chinese medicine for adult major depression: A protocol for network meta-analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of Nrf2 signaling pathway in diabetic cardiomyopathy: from pathogenesis to traditional Chinese medicine interventions.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Combining network pharmacology and experimental verification to reveal the mechanism of Chaigui granules in the treatment of depression through PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathways.Metabolic brain disease · 2023Article
- Key Risk Genes Identified From the Postmortem Brain of Patients With Major Depressive Disorder and Their Potential Clinical Applications.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMajor depression disorder (MDD) is a severe health threat characterized by persistent depression, loss of interests, lack of initiative, and even suicidal tendencies. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is well tolerated and effective in treating adult MDD. However, research on the evaluation of efficacy and acceptability of different TCM strategies for adult MDD is insufficient. Consequently, it is high time to evaluate the efficacy of TCM strategies for adult MDD. Meanwhile, the acceptability of different TCM strategies is worth exploring.
methodsComprehensively and systematically retrieve the literature in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI), Wanfang Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), and Chinese BioMedical Literature Database (CBM). The literature search will focus on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with TCM in adult MDD. Two reviewers will search the literature and extract relevant data back-to-back. Once mismatched outcomes appear, arbitration will be conducted by a third reviewer. Based on the Bayesian framework, data analysis is carried out with STATA and WinBUGS software. Heterogeneity, transitivity, consistency test, bias risk assessment, subgroup and sensitivity analysis, evidence quality evaluation will be performed accordingly.
resultsThe efficacy and acceptability of different TCM strategies for adults with MDD will be compared and sorted.
conclusionThe study will facilitate the treatment options of adults MDD according to the supporting evidence. INPLASY REGISTRATION NUMBER: INPLASY2020100028.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.