Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33217381›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2021

Sample Preparation and Imaging Conditions Affect mEos3.2 Photophysics in Fission Yeast Cells.

Mengyuan Sun, Kevin Hu, Joerg Bewersdorf, Thomas D Pollard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mengyuan SunDepartment of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Kevin HuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Joerg BewersdorfDepartment of Cell Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. Electronic address: joerg.bewersdorf@yale.edu.
Thomas D PollardDepartment of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Molecular Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Cell Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. Electronic address: thomas.pollard@yale.edu.

Funding

Mechanism of cytokinesis in fission yeastR01GM026132 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI POLLARD, THOMAS D. · 1985 to 2021
$8.8M
Enabling Nanoscale Dynamic Imaging of Vesicles and OrganellesR01GM118486 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI BADDELEY, DAVID, BEWERSDORF, JOERG · 2016 to 2019
$3.4M
Convergent Graduate Training in Engineering, Physics and BiologyT32EB019941 · NIBIB · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI O'HERN, COREY · 2016 to 2020
$998k
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB019941NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM026132NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM118486Wellcome Trust 203285/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photoconvertible fluorescent proteins (PCFPs) are widely used in super-resolution microscopy and studies of cellular dynamics. However, our understanding of their photophysics is still limited, hampering their quantitative application. For example, we do not know the optimal sample preparation methods or imaging conditions to count protein molecules fused to PCFPs by single-molecule localization microscopy in live and fixed cells. We also do not know how the behavior of PCFPs in live cells compares with fixed cells. Therefore, we investigated how formaldehyde fixation influences the photophysical properties of the popular green-to-red PCFP mEos3.2 in fission yeast cells under a wide range of imaging conditions. We estimated photophysical parameters by fitting a three-state model of photoconversion and photobleaching to the time course of fluorescence signal per yeast cell expressing mEos3.2. We discovered that formaldehyde fixation makes the fluorescence signal, photoconversion rate, and photobleaching rate of mEos3.2 sensitive to the buffer conditions likely by permeabilizing the yeast cell membrane. Under some imaging conditions, the time-integrated mEos3.2 signal per yeast cell is similar in live cells and fixed cells imaged in buffer at pH 8.5 with 1 mM DTT, indicating that light chemical fixation does not destroy mEos3.2 molecules. We also discovered that 405-nm irradiation drove some red-state mEos3.2 molecules to enter an intermediate dark state, which can be converted back to the red fluorescent state by 561-nm illumination. Our findings provide a guide to quantitatively compare conditions for imaging mEos3.2-tagged molecules in yeast cells. Our imaging assay and mathematical model are easy to implement and provide a simple quantitative approach to measure the time-integrated signal and the photoconversion and photobleaching rates of fluorescent proteins in cells.

Indexed as

SchizosaccharomycesLuminescent ProteinsMicroscopy, FluorescencePhotobleachingLuminescent Proteins

Identifiers

PMID33217381
PMCPMC7820738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.