Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33217321›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2020

Spindle Scaling Is Governed by Cell Boundary Regulation of Microtubule Nucleation.

Elisa Maria Rieckhoff, Frederic Berndt, Maria Elsner, Stefan Golfier, Franziska Decker, Keisuke Ishihara, Jan Brugués

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mitotic Cdc42 waves encode PI(3,4)PScience advances · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Length control emerges from cytoskeletal network geometry.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elisa Maria RieckhoffMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, 01307 Dresden, Germany; Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, 01187 Dresden, Germany; Centre for Systems Biology Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany; Cluster of Excellence Physics of Life, TU Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany.
Frederic BerndtMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, 01307 Dresden, Germany; Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, 01187 Dresden, Germany; Centre for Systems Biology Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany; Cluster of Excellence Physics of Life, TU Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany.
Maria ElsnerMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, 01307 Dresden, Germany; Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, 01187 Dresden, Germany; Centre for Systems Biology Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany; Cluster of Excellence Physics of Life, TU Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany.
Stefan GolfierMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, 01307 Dresden, Germany; Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, 01187 Dresden, Germany; Centre for Systems Biology Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany; Cluster of Excellence Physics of Life, TU Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany.
Franziska DeckerMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, 01307 Dresden, Germany; Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, 01187 Dresden, Germany; Centre for Systems Biology Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany; Cluster of Excellence Physics of Life, TU Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany.
Keisuke IshiharaMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, 01307 Dresden, Germany; Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, 01187 Dresden, Germany; Centre for Systems Biology Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany; Cluster of Excellence Physics of Life, TU Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany.
Jan BruguésMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, 01307 Dresden, Germany; Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, 01187 Dresden, Germany; Centre for Systems Biology Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany; Cluster of Excellence Physics of Life, TU Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany. Electronic address: brugues@mpi-cbg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular organelles such as the mitotic spindle adjust their size to the dimensions of the cell. It is widely understood that spindle scaling is governed by regulation of microtubule polymerization. Here, we use quantitative microscopy in living zebrafish embryos and Xenopus egg extracts in combination with theory to show that microtubule polymerization dynamics are insufficient to scale spindles and only contribute below a critical cell size. In contrast, microtubule nucleation governs spindle scaling for all cell sizes. We show that this hierarchical regulation arises from the partitioning of a nucleation inhibitor to the cell membrane. Our results reveal that cells differentially regulate microtubule number and length using distinct geometric cues to maintain a functional spindle architecture over a large range of cell sizes.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell MembraneEmbryonic DevelopmentEmbryo, NonmammalianIntravital MicroscopyMicrotubulesMitosisSpindle ApparatusXenopus laevisZebrafishhierarchical regulationmicrotubule dynamicsmicrotubule nucleationmitotic spindlescalingspindle sizesurface-to-volume ratioXenopuszebrafish

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.