Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33217210›Full record

ArticleThe plant genome2020

On Hadamard and Kronecker products in covariance structures for genotype × environment interaction.

Johannes W R Martini, Jose Crossa, Fernando H Toledo, Jaime Cuevas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The plant genome, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Johannes W R MartiniInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km. 45, El Batán 56237 Texcoco, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-0628-6794
Jose CrossaInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km. 45, El Batán 56237 Texcoco, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-9429-5855
Fernando H ToledoInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km. 45, El Batán 56237 Texcoco, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-0158-643X
Jaime CuevasUniversidad de Quintana Roo, Del Bosque, 77019 Chetumal, Q.R., Mexico.

Funding

Bill & the Melinda Gates Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When including genotype × environment interactions (G × E) in genomic prediction models, Hadamard or Kronecker products have been used to model the covariance structure of interactions. The relation between these two types of modeling has not been made clear in genomic prediction literature. Here, we demonstrate that a certain model based on a Hadamard formulation and another using the Kronecker product lead to exactly the same statistical model. Moreover, we illustrate how a multiplication of entries of covariance matrices is related to modeling locus × environmental-variable interactions explicitly. Finally, we use a wheat and a maize data set to illustrate that the environmental covariance E can be specified easily, also if no information on environmental variables - such as temperature or precipitation - is available. Given that lines have been tested in different environments, the corresponding environmental covariance can simply be estimated from the training set as phenotypic covariance between environments. To achieve a high level of increase in predictive ability, the environmental covariance has to be defined appropriately and records on the performance of the lines of the test set under different environmental conditions have to be included in the training set.

Indexed as

Gene-Environment InteractionModels, GeneticGenomicsGenotypeTriticum

Identifiers

PMID33217210
PMCPMC12806884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.