Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33217204›Full record

ArticleThe plant genome2020

Genome-based prediction of multiple wheat quality traits in multiple years.

Maria Itria Ibba, Jose Crossa, Osval A Montesinos-López, Abelardo Montesinos-López, Philomin Juliana, Carlos Guzman, Emily Delorean, Susanne Dreisigacker, Jesse Poland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The plant genome, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluating reaction norm and fixed effect models for genomic selection of end-use quality in wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maria Itria IbbaInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45 Carretera, Mexico-Veracruz, CP, 52640, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-3263-0301
Jose CrossaInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45 Carretera, Mexico-Veracruz, CP, 52640, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-9429-5855
Osval A Montesinos-LópezFacultad de Telemática, Universidad de Colima, Colima, México.
Abelardo Montesinos-LópezDepartamento de Matemáticas, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierías (CUCEI), Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44430, México.
Philomin JulianaInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45 Carretera, Mexico-Veracruz, CP, 52640, Mexico.
Carlos GuzmanDepartamento de Genética, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica y de Montes, Campus de Rabanales, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
Emily DeloreanDepartment of Agronomy, Kansas State University, 2004 Throckmorton Plant Science Center, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA.
Susanne DreisigackerInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45 Carretera, Mexico-Veracruz, CP, 52640, Mexico.
Jesse PolandDepartment of Agronomy, Kansas State University, 2004 Throckmorton Plant Science Center, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7856-1399

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wheat quality improvement is an important objective in all wheat breeding programs. However, due to the cost, time and quantity of seed required, wheat quality is typically analyzed only in the last stages of the breeding cycle on a limited number of samples. The use of genomic prediction could greatly help to select for wheat quality more efficiently by reducing the cost and time required for this analysis. Here were evaluated the prediction performances of 13 wheat quality traits under two multi-trait models (Bayesian multi-trait multi-environment [BMTME] and multi-trait ridge regression [MTR]) using five data sets of wheat lines evaluated in the field during two consecutive years. Lines in the second year (testing) were predicted using the quality information obtained in the first year (training). For most quality traits were found moderate to high prediction accuracies, suggesting that the use of genomic selection could be feasible. The best predictions were obtained with the BMTME model in all traits and the worst with the MTR model. The best predictions with the BMTME model under the mean arctangent absolute percentage error (MAAPE) were for test weight across the five data sets, whereas the worst predictions were for the alveograph trait ALVPL. In contrast, under Pearson's correlation, the best predictions depended on the data set. The results obtained suggest that the BMTME model should be preferred for multi-trait prediction analyses. This model allows to obtain not only the correlation among traits, but also the correlation among environments, helping to increase the prediction accuracy.

Indexed as

Plant BreedingTriticumBayes TheoremGenomePhenotype

Identifiers

PMID33217204
PMCPMC12806979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.