Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33217171›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2021

Quantitative Assessment of Levonorgestrel Binding Partner Interplay and Drug-Drug Interactions Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling.

Brian Cicali, Karthik Lingineni, Rodrigo Cristofoletti, Thomas Wendl, Joachim Hoechel, Herbert Wiesinger, Ayyappa Chaturvedula, Valvanera Vozmediano, Stephan Schmidt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Combined Oral Contraceptives As Victims of Drug Interactions.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Brian CicaliCenter for Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Karthik LingineniCenter for Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Rodrigo CristofolettiCenter for Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Thomas WendlBayer AG Pharmaceuticals, Leverkusen, Germany.
Joachim HoechelBayer AG Pharmaceuticals, Leverkusen, Germany.
Herbert WiesingerBayer AG Pharmaceuticals, Leverkusen, Germany.
Ayyappa ChaturvedulaDepartment of Pharmacotherapy, System College of Pharmacy, University of Northern Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
Valvanera VozmedianoCenter for Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Stephan SchmidtCenter for Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
University of Florida · USBayer (Germany) · DEUniversity of North Texas System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Levonorgestrel (LNG) is the active moiety in many hormonal contraceptive formulations. It is typically coformulated with ethinyl estradiol (EE) to decrease intermenstrual bleeding. Due to its widespread use and CYP3A4-mediated metabolism, there is concern regarding drug-drug interactions (DDIs), particularly a suboptimal LNG exposure when co-administered with CYP3A4 inducers, potentially leading to unintended pregnancies. The goal of this analysis was to determine the impact of DDIs on the systemic exposure of LNG. To this end, we developed and verified a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for LNG in PK-Sim (version 8.0) accounting for the impact of EE and body mass index (BMI) on LNG's binding to sex-hormone binding globulin. Model parameters were optimized following intravenous and oral administration of 0.09 mg LNG. The combined LNG-EE PBPK model was verified regarding CYP3A4-mediated interaction by comparing to published clinical DDI study data with carbamazepine, rifampicin, and efavirenz (CYP3A4 inducers). Once verified, the model was applied to predict systemic LNG exposure in normal BMI and obese women (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdultAlkynesBenzoxazinesBody Mass IndexCarbamazepineClarithromycinComputer SimulationContraceptives, Oral, CombinedCyclopropanesCytochrome P-450 CYP3A InducersCytochrome P-450 CYP3A InhibitorsDrug CombinationsDrug InteractionsEthinyl EstradiolFemaleAlkynesBenzoxazinesCarbamazepineClarithromycinContraceptives, Oral, CombinedCyclopropanesCytochrome P-450 CYP3A InducersCytochrome P-450 CYP3A InhibitorsDrug CombinationsefavirenzEthinyl Estradiolethinyl estradiol, levonorgestrel drug combinationItraconazoleLevonorgestrelRifampinSex Hormone-Binding Globulin

Identifiers

PMID33217171
PMCPMC7825189
OpenAlexW3106488252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.