Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33217027›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2021

Pharmacometric analyses to characterize the effect of CSL112 on apolipoprotein A-I and cholesterol efflux capacity in acute myocardial infarction patients.

Bo Zheng, Danielle Duffy, Pierluigi Tricoci, Helen Kastrissios, Marc Pfister, Samuel D Wright, Andreas Gille, Michael A Tortorici

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Nanomedicine for Diagnosis and Treatment of Atherosclerosis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  5. A systematic review of cardiacProgress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Bo ZhengCSL Behring, King of Prussia, PA, USA.
Danielle DuffyCSL Behring, King of Prussia, PA, USA.
Pierluigi TricociCSL Behring, King of Prussia, PA, USA.
Helen KastrissiosCertara Strategic Consulting, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Marc PfisterCertara Strategic Consulting, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Samuel D WrightCSL Behring, King of Prussia, PA, USA.
Andreas GilleCSL Behring, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Michael A TortoriciCSL Behring, King of Prussia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2822-5805
CSL (United States) · USCertara (United States) · USCSL (Switzerland) · CHUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo characterize relationships between apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I) exposure and cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) and covariate effects following CSL112 (apoA-I [human]) administration in an integrated population including acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients.

methodsA pharmacometric analysis utilized data from seven clinical trials, including patients with AMI, subjects with renal impairment and healthy subjects. A population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was performed to relate CSL112 doses to changes in apoA-I plasma concentrations. Covariate analysis was conducted to identify sources of variability in apoA-I exposure. Exposure-response modeling was conducted to describe the relationship between apoA-I exposure and total or ATP binding cassette transporter A1-(ABCA1)-dependent CEC and to identify clinical predictors of CEC.

resultsA two-compartment model described apoA-I PK. ApoA-I clearance was slightly lower in subjects with AMI, whereas baseline apoA-I was marginally higher in female and Japanese subjects. Covariate effects on apoA-I exposure were in the order of 10% and thus not clinically relevant. The relationships between apoA-I exposure and CECs were described by nonlinear models. Simulations showed CEC elevation resulting from apoA-I exposure increment was comparable in AMI and non-AMI subjects; no covariate had clinically meaningful effects on CEC. Simulations also demonstrated that CEC in patients with AMI post 6 g CSL112 dosing was substantially elevated compared to placebo and lower dose levels.

conclusionsThe model-based exposure-response analysis demonstrated, irrespective of body weight, sex and race, that fixed 6 g CSL112 dosing causes a desired CEC elevation, which may benefit AMI patients by potentially reducing early recurrent cardiovascular event risk.

Indexed as

Apolipoprotein A-IMyocardial InfarctionCholesterolFemaleHumansLipoproteins, HDLMaleApolipoprotein A-ICholesterolCSL112Lipoproteins, HDLatherosclerosisclinical trialsmodelling and simulationpharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamicspharmacometrics

Identifiers

PMID33217027
PMCPMC8247400
OpenAlexW3100411009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.