Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33216757›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Validity of bioelectrical impedance to estimate fat-free mass in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Evellyn C Grilo, Thais A Cunha, Ádila Danielly S Costa, Bárbara G M Araújo, Márcia Marília G D Lopes, Bruna L L Maciel, Camila X Alves, Karina M Vermeulen-Serpa, Mário Emílio T Dourado-Júnior, Lucia Leite-Lais and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Maximal Oxygen Consumption Is Negatively Associated with Fat Mass in Facioscapulohumeral Dystrophy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Evellyn C GriloPostgraduate Health Sciences Program, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7647-6572
Thais A CunhaPostgraduate Health Sciences Program, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Ádila Danielly S CostaPostgraduate Nutrition Program, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Bárbara G M AraújoNutrition Department, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Márcia Marília G D LopesNutrition Department, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Bruna L L MacielNutrition Department, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Camila X AlvesNeurology outpatient facility, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Karina M Vermeulen-SerpaPostgraduate Health Sciences Program, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Mário Emílio T Dourado-JúniorDepartment of Internal Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Lucia Leite-LaisNutrition Department, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
José Brandão-NetoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Sancha Helena L ValeNutrition Department, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0972-1678
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evaluation of fat-free mass (FFM) in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is useful to investigate disease progression and therapeutic efficacy. This study aimed to validate the Bioelectrical impedance (BIA) method compared with the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for estimating the %FFM in boys with DMD. This is a cross-sectional study performed with children and adolescents diagnosed with DMD. Resistance and reactance were measured with a BIA analyzer, from which eight predictive equations estimated the %FFM. The %FFM was also determined by DXA and its used as a reference method. Pearson correlation test, coefficient of determination, the root-mean-square error, the interclass correlation coefficient, and linear regression analysis were performed between %FFM values obtained by BIA and DXA. The agreement between these values was verified with the Bland-Altman plot analysis. Forty-six boys aged from 5 to 20 years were enrolled in the study. All the equations showed a correlation between the %FFM estimated by BIA and determined by DXA (p < 0.05). The Bland-Altman method indicated that two equations have a significant bias (p < 0.05) and six equations showed no significant bias of %FFM (p > 0.05). However, one of them has high variation and wide limits of agreement. Five of eight %FFM predictive equations tested in DMD were accurate when compared with the DXA. It can be concluded that BIA is a validity method to evaluate patients with DMD.

Indexed as

Body CompositionElectric ImpedanceAbsorptiometry, PhotonAdolescentAlgorithmsBody Mass IndexBody WeightChildCross-Sectional StudiesHumansLinear ModelsMaleMuscular Dystrophy, DuchenneYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33216757
PMCPMC7679022
OpenAlexW3103884425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.