ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2020
Analysis of Macular Microperimetry Characteristics in Non-Arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Restoring visual function in NAION by means of transpalpebral electrical stimulation: A case report.European journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Review
- Sildenafil-Associated Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy with Optic Nerve Enhancement in Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Pleocytosis in Cerebrospinal Fluid: A Case Report.Case reports in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to analyze the correlation of macular micro-field characteristics with vision and visual field in patients with non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. MATERIAL AND METHODS Retrospective case analysis was performed. Fifty-eight NAION patients with 62 affected eyes were included in the study. In addition, 54 eyes not affected by NAION from 54 patients among the 58 patients were included as controls. All eyes underwent best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) test, slit lamp biomicroscopy, indirect ophthalmoscopy, visual field examination, and microperimetry. BCVA was converted into logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (LogMAR) for statistical analysis. There was no significant difference in age, sex, eye type, or intraocular pressure between the 2 groups. The macular integrity assessment (MAIA) instrument was used for microperimetry. Mean light sensitivity (microMS) in the 10° macular region and the fixation rates for macular fovea 2° and 4° were recorded. Spearman correlation analysis was performed. RESULTS The microMS values were significantly different between the control group and the affected eye group (t=-2.427, P=0.036). MicroMS was significantly correlated with logMAR BCVA (r=-0.802, P=-0.005) and with mean sensitivity (MS) and mean deviation (MD) (r=0.912, P=0.002; r=-0.905, P=0.002; P<0.05). MS and MD were not correlated with logMAR BCVA (r=-0.465, P=0.245; r=0.437, P=0.278). CONCLUSIONS The present study demonstrates that microMS of macular micro-visual field in NAION patients was significantly decreased at early stage, and was significantly correlated with and consistent with visual acuity and visual field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.