Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33216726›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020

Dynamic Public Health Surveillance to Track and Mitigate the US COVID-19 Epidemic: Longitudinal Trend Analysis Study.

Lori Ann Post, Tariq Ziad Issa, Michael J Boctor, Charles B Moss, Robert L Murphy, Michael G Ison, Chad J Achenbach, Danielle Resnick, Lauren Nadya Singh, Janine White and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Has Omicron Changed the Evolution of the Pandemic?JMIR public health and surveillance · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lori Ann PostBuehler Center for Health Policy & Economics and Departments of Emergency Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6261-3254
Tariq Ziad IssaFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0978-5225
Michael J BoctorFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9268-8417
Charles B MossInstitute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1172-7112
Robert L MurphyCenter for Global Communicable Diseases, Institute for Global Health, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3936-2052
Michael G IsonDivsion of Infectious Disease, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3347-9671
Chad J AchenbachDivsion of Infectious Disease, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4847-7249
Danielle ResnickInternational Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6285-3461
Lauren Nadya SinghBuehler Center for Health Policy & Economics and Departments of Emergency Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7025-9614
Janine WhiteBuehler Center for Health Policy & Economics and Departments of Emergency Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7204-477X
Joshua Marco Mitchell FaberFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9786-6198
Kasen CullerFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6485-7623
Cynthia A BrandtYale Center for Medical Informatics, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8179-1796
James Francis OehmkeBuehler Center for Health Policy & Economics and Departments of Emergency Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2003-3443
Northwestern University · USInternational Food Policy Research Institute · USUniversity of Florida · USYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe emergence of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, has led to a global pandemic. The United States has been severely affected, accounting for the most COVID-19 cases and deaths worldwide. Without a coordinated national public health plan informed by surveillance with actionable metrics, the United States has been ineffective at preventing and mitigating the escalating COVID-19 pandemic. Existing surveillance has incomplete ascertainment and is limited by the use of standard surveillance metrics. Although many COVID-19 data sources track infection rates, informing prevention requires capturing the relevant dynamics of the pandemic.

objectiveThe aim of this study is to develop dynamic metrics for public health surveillance that can inform worldwide COVID-19 prevention efforts. Advanced surveillance techniques are essential to inform public health decision making and to identify where and when corrective action is required to prevent outbreaks.

methodsUsing a longitudinal trend analysis study design, we extracted COVID-19 data from global public health registries. We used an empirical difference equation to measure daily case numbers for our use case in 50 US states and the District of Colombia as a function of the prior number of cases, the level of testing, and weekly shift variables based on a dynamic panel model that was estimated using the generalized method of moments approach by implementing the Arellano-Bond estimator in R.

resultsExamination of the United States and state data demonstrated that most US states are experiencing outbreaks as measured by these new metrics of speed, acceleration, jerk, and persistence. Larger US states have high COVID-19 caseloads as a function of population size, density, and deficits in adherence to public health guidelines early in the epidemic, and other states have alarming rates of speed, acceleration, jerk, and 7-day persistence in novel infections. North and South Dakota have had the highest rates of COVID-19 transmission combined with positive acceleration, jerk, and 7-day persistence. Wisconsin and Illinois also have alarming indicators and already lead the nation in daily new COVID-19 infections. As the United States enters its third wave of COVID-19, all 50 states and the District of Colombia have positive rates of speed between 7.58 (Hawaii) and 175.01 (North Dakota), and persistence, ranging from 4.44 (Vermont) to 195.35 (North Dakota) new infections per 100,000 people.

conclusionsStandard surveillance techniques such as daily and cumulative infections and deaths are helpful but only provide a static view of what has already occurred in the pandemic and are less helpful in prevention. Public health policy that is informed by dynamic surveillance can shift the country from reacting to COVID-19 transmissions to being proactive and taking corrective action when indicators of speed, acceleration, jerk, and persistence remain positive week over week. Implicit within our dynamic surveillance is an early warning system that indicates when there is problematic growth in COVID-19 transmissions as well as signals when growth will become explosive without action. A public health approach that focuses on prevention can prevent major outbreaks in addition to endorsing effective public health policies. Moreover, subnational analyses on the dynamics of the pandemic allow us to zero in on where transmissions are increasing, meaning corrective action can be applied with precision in problematic areas. Dynamic public health surveillance can inform specific geographies where quarantines are necessary while preserving the economy in other US areas.

Indexed as

Public Health SurveillanceCOVID-19HumansLongitudinal StudiesPandemicsPublic HealthRegistriesSARS-CoV-2United StatesArellano-Bond estimatorCOVID-19COVID-19 accelerationCOVID-19 jerkCOVID-19 persistenceCOVID-19 speedCOVID-19 transmission accelerationdynamic panel datageneralized method of the momentsglobal COVID-19 surveillancesurveillance metricsUnited States econometricsUnited States public health surveillanceUS COVID-19US COVID-19 surveillance systemUS COVID-19 transmission speedUS SARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33216726
PMCPMC7717896
OpenAlexW3100681411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.