Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33216712›Full record

ArticleeLife2020

The amygdala instructs insular feedback for affective learning.

Dominic Kargl, Joanna Kaczanowska, Sophia Ulonska, Florian Groessl, Lukasz Piszczek, Jelena Lazovic, Katja Buehler, Wulf Haubensak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Neuromodulation in Small Animal fMRI.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Charting the path in rodent functional neuroimaging.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Role of the Insular Cortex in Pain.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Encoding of Environmental Cues in Central Amygdala Neurons during Foraging.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dominic Kargl *Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7206-1708
Joanna Kaczanowska *Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-3166-9095
Sophia UlonskaVRVis Zentrum für Virtual Reality und Visualisierung Forschungs-GmbH (VRVis), Vienna, Austria.
Florian GroesslResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.
Lukasz PiszczekResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2017-8853
Jelena LazovicPreclinical Imaging Facility (pcIMAG), Vienna Biocenter Core Facilities (VBCF), Vienna, Austria.
Katja BuehlerVRVis Zentrum für Virtual Reality und Visualisierung Forschungs-GmbH (VRVis), Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0362-7998
Wulf HaubensakResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2034-9184

Funding

Austrian Research Promotion Agency 852936Austrian Research Promotion Agency 854174European Commission 311701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Affective responses depend on assigning value to environmental predictors of threat or reward. Neuroanatomically, this affective value is encoded at both cortical and subcortical levels. However, the purpose of this distributed representation across functional hierarchies remains unclear. Using fMRI in mice, we mapped a discrete cortico-limbic loop between insular cortex (IC), central amygdala (CE), and nucleus basalis of Meynert (NBM), which decomposes the affective value of a conditioned stimulus (CS) into its salience and valence components. In IC, learning integrated unconditioned stimulus (US)-evoked bodily states into CS valence. In turn, CS salience in the CE recruited these CS representations bottom-up via the cholinergic NBM. This way, the CE incorporated interoceptive feedback from IC to improve discrimination of CS valence. Consequently, opto-/chemogenetic uncoupling of hierarchical information flow disrupted affective learning and conditioned responding. Dysfunctional interactions in the IC↔CE/NBM network may underlie intolerance to uncertainty, observed in autism and related psychiatric conditions.

Indexed as

AffectAnimalsCentral Amygdaloid NucleusCerebral CortexConditioning, ClassicalLearningMaleMiceaffective learningamygdalacholinergic basal forebrainhierarchical interactioninsular cortexinteroceptive valuemouseneuroscience

Identifiers

PMID33216712
PMCPMC7679142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.