ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2020
Home Monitoring of Cardiac Devices in the Era of COVID-19.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- mHealth technologies in research studying cardiovascular health in cancer: A systematic review.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Health Care 2025: How Consumer-Facing Devices Change Health Management and Delivery.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Effects of a Cloud-Based Synchronous Telehealth Program on Valvular Regurgitation Regression: Retrospective Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- MYSTETH-home-based heart monitoring.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Remote, smart telemonitoring of COVID-19 survivors for early detection of deterioration in cardiac health (the PARTMO study).Frontiers in medical technology · 2025Article
- COVID-19 and Cardiac Arrhythmias: Lesson Learned and Dilemmas.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Effect of Telehealth Services on Mitral and Tricuspid Regurgitation Progression: Retrospective Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Cardiology in a Digital Age: Opportunities and Challenges for e-Health: A Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Computerization of the Work of General Practitioners: Mixed Methods Survey of Final-Year Medical Students in Ireland.JMIR medical education · 2023Article
- Virtual Cardiology: Past, Present, Future Directions, and Considerations.Current cardiovascular risk reports · 2023Review
- Neurological Outpatients Prefer EEG Home-Monitoring over Inpatient Monitoring-An Analysis Based on the UTAUT Model.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- A Contact-Free Optical Device for the Detection of Pulmonary Congestion-A Pilot Study.Biosensors · 2022Article
- On the Use of Assistive Technology during the COVID-19 Outbreak: Results and Lessons Learned from Pilot Studies.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Impact of remote monitoring in heart failure patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices during COVID-19 pandemic: a single center experience.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2022Article
- Patients with Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices in the Era of COVID-19 and Their Response to Telemedical Solutions.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- Occurrence of Relative Bradycardia and Relative Tachycardia in Individuals Diagnosed With COVID-19.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Lockdown measures for COVID-19 outbreak and variation in physical activity in patients with heart failure and cardiac implantable devices.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2021Article
- Late phase of COVID-19 pandemic in General Cardiology. A position paper of the ESC Council for Cardiology Practice.ESC heart failure · 2021Article
- Smart Wearables for Cardiac Monitoring-Real-World Use beyond Atrial Fibrillation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Use of Smartphone-operated ECG for home ECG surveillance in COVID-19 patients.European heart journal. Digital health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewDespite the promise of remote patient monitoring (RPM), this technology remained underutilized secondary to a lack of data transparency and systems issues until the COVID-19 pandemic ushered in a new era of telehealth and virtual solutions out of necessity. This review will explore the data supporting the use of RPM via both implantable and wearable devices in the field of cardiology and the role of home monitoring using RPM in the era of COVID-19. RECENT
findingsRPM using implantable cardiac devices is a safe alternative to in-person only visits which leads to enhanced patient satisfaction and improved clinical outcomes. Consumer-grade wearable sensors have drastically expanded RPM capabilities from just the sickest cardiac patients to the entire population aiding in early diagnosis and real-time disease management. Home monitoring enabled by automated alert systems tailored specifically to the needs of the patient by the provider will be the cornerstone of a more continuous, patent-centric healthcare model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.