ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2021
A novel way to validate UAS-based high-throughput phenotyping protocols using in silico experiments for plant breeding purposes.
Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimizing Genomic-Enabled Prediction in Small-Scale Maize Hybrid Breeding Programs: A Roadmap Review.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Pooled it
- Bridging tradition and innovation: a review of computer simulations in plant breeding.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Review
- How to make sense of 3D representations for plant phenotyping: a compendium of processing and analysis techniques.Plant methods · 2023Review
- Quinoa Phenotyping Methodologies: An International Consensus.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
key messageIt is possible to make inferences regarding the feasibility and applicability of plant high-throughput phenotyping via computer simulations. Protocol validation has been a key challenge to the establishment of high-throughput phenotyping (HTP) in breeding programs. We add to this matter by proposing an innovative way for designing and validating aerial imagery-based HTP approaches with in silico 3D experiments for plant breeding purposes. The algorithm is constructed following a pipeline composed of the simulation of phenotypic values, three-dimensional modeling of trials, and image rendering. Our tool is exemplified by testing a set of experimental setups that are of interest in the context of maize breeding using a comprehensive case study. We report on how the choice of (percentile of) points in dense clouds, the experimental repeatability (heritability), the treatment variance (genetic variability), and the flight altitude affect the accuracy of high-throughput plant height estimation based on conventional structure-from-motion (SfM) and multi-view stereo (MVS) pipelines. The evaluation of both the algorithm and the case study was driven by comparisons of the computer-simulated (ground truth) and the HTP-estimated values using correlations, regressions, and similarity indices. Our results showed that the 3D experiments can be adequately reconstructed, enabling inference-making. Moreover, it suggests that treatment variance, repeatability, and the choice of the percentile of points are highly influential over the accuracy of HTP. Conversely, flight altitude influenced the quality of reconstruction but not the accuracy of plant height estimation. Therefore, we believe that our tool can be of high value, enabling the promotion of new insights and further understanding of the events underlying the practice of high-throughput phenotyping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.