Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33216193›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2021

Intestinal anti-inflammatory effects of probiotics in DNBS-colitis via modulation of gut microbiota and microRNAs.

Francesca Algieri, José Garrido-Mesa, Teresa Vezza, María Jesús Rodríguez-Sojo, María Elena Rodríguez-Cabezas, Mónica Olivares, Federico García, Julio Gálvez, Rocío Morón, Alba Rodríguez-Nogales

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Microbiotherapy: an emerging adjunct for burn wound healing.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Francesca AlgieriCIBER-EHD, Department of Pharmacology, Center for Biomedical Research (CIBM), University of Granada, 18071, Granada, Spain.
José Garrido-MesaCIBER-EHD, Department of Pharmacology, Center for Biomedical Research (CIBM), University of Granada, 18071, Granada, Spain.
Teresa VezzaCIBER-EHD, Department of Pharmacology, Center for Biomedical Research (CIBM), University of Granada, 18071, Granada, Spain. teresavezza@hotmail.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9780-0180
María Jesús Rodríguez-SojoCIBER-EHD, Department of Pharmacology, Center for Biomedical Research (CIBM), University of Granada, 18071, Granada, Spain.
María Elena Rodríguez-CabezasCIBER-EHD, Department of Pharmacology, Center for Biomedical Research (CIBM), University of Granada, 18071, Granada, Spain.
Mónica OlivaresResearch Department of Biosearch, 18004, Granada, Spain.
Federico GarcíaInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada (Ibs.GRANADA), 18012, Granada, Spain.
Julio GálvezCIBER-EHD, Department of Pharmacology, Center for Biomedical Research (CIBM), University of Granada, 18071, Granada, Spain.
Rocío Morón *Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada (Ibs.GRANADA), 18012, Granada, Spain.
Alba Rodríguez-Nogales *CIBER-EHD, Department of Pharmacology, Center for Biomedical Research (CIBM), University of Granada, 18071, Granada, Spain.

Funding

Junta de Andalucía CTS 164Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness SAF2011-29648 and AGL2015-67995-C3-3-R
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeProbiotics have been shown to exert beneficial effects in IBD although their exact mechanisms are not completely understood. The aim of the present study was to assess the intestinal anti-inflammatory activity of different probiotics (Lactobacillus fermentum CECT5716, Lactobacillus salivarius CECT5713, Escherichia coli Nissle 1917, Saccharomyces boulardii CNCMI-745 in the dinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (DNBS) model of mouse colitis and correlate it with the modifications of the gut microbiota and the immune response, focusing on miRNA expression.

methodsThe probiotics were daily administered orally for 25 days. On day 19 colitis was induced by rectal installation of DNBS. At the end of the treatment, mice were sacrificed and the colonic damage was assessed biochemically by analysing the expression of different markers involved in the immune response, including miRNAs; and the colonic microbiota by pyrosequencing. Probiotics properties were also evaluated in vitro in different immune cell types (CMT-93 intestinal epithelial cells and bone marrow-derived macrophages), where the expression of different mRNAs and miRNAs was examined.

resultsAll the probiotics displayed intestinal anti-inflammatory effects but slightly different, especially regarding miRNAs expression. Likewise, the probiotics ameliorated the colitis-associated dysbiosis, although showing differences in the main bacterial groups affected.

conclusionAmong the probiotics assayed, Lactobacillus fermentum CECT5716 and Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 appear to present the best intestinal anti-inflammatory effects, being the latter one of the few probiotics with reputed efficacy in human IBD. Therefore, Lactobacillus fermentum CECT5716 could be considered as a complementary nutritional strategy for IBD treatment.

Indexed as

ColitisGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicroRNAsProbioticsAnimalsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsDinitrobenzenesMiceSulfonic AcidsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsDinitrobenzenesMicroRNAsSulfonic AcidsGut microbiotamicroRNAMouse experimental colitisProbioticsPyrosequencing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.