Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33216166›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2021

Temporal discounting and smoking cessation: choice consistency predicts nicotine abstinence in treatment-seeking smokers.

Charlotte M Grosskopf, Nils B Kroemer, Shakoor Pooseh, Franziska Böhme, Michael N Smolka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Anhedonia in Nicotine Dependence.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Charlotte M GrosskopfDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuroimaging Center, Technische Universität Dresden, 01187, Dresden, Germany.
Nils B KroemerDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuroimaging Center, Technische Universität Dresden, 01187, Dresden, Germany.
Shakoor PoosehDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuroimaging Center, Technische Universität Dresden, 01187, Dresden, Germany.
Franziska BöhmeDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuroimaging Center, Technische Universität Dresden, 01187, Dresden, Germany.
Michael N SmolkaDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuroimaging Center, Technische Universität Dresden, 01187, Dresden, Germany. michael.smolka@tu-dresden.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5398-5569

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SFB 940Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SM 80/5-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SM 80/5-2Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SM 80/7-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SM 80/7-2Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft TRR 265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSmokers discount delayed rewards steeper than non-smokers or ex-smokers, possibly due to neuropharmacological effects of tobacco on brain circuitry, or lower abstinence rates in smokers with steep discounting. To delineate both theories from each other, we tested if temporal discounting, choice inconsistency, and related brain activity in treatment-seeking smokers (1) are higher compared to non-smokers, (2) decrease after smoking cessation, and (3) predict relapse.

methodsAt T1, 44 dependent smokers, 29 non-smokers, and 30 occasional smokers underwent fMRI while performing an intertemporal choice task. Smokers were measured before and 21 days after cessation if abstinent from nicotine. In total, 27 smokers, 28 non-smokers, and 29 occasional smokers were scanned again at T2. Discounting rate k and inconsistency var(k) were estimated with Bayesian analysis.

resultsFirst, k and var(k) in smokers in treatment were not higher than in non-smokers or occasional smokers. Second, neither k nor var(k) changed after smoking cessation. Third, k did not predict relapse, but high var(k) was associated with relapse during treatment and over 6 months. Brain activity in valuation and decision networks did not significantly differ between groups and conditions.

conclusionOur data from treatment-seeking smokers do not support the pharmacological hypothesis of pronounced reversible changes in discounting behavior and brain activity, possibly due to limited power. Behavioral data rather suggest that differences between current and ex-smokers might be due to selection. The association of choice consistency and treatment outcome possibly links consistent intertemporal decisions to remaining abstinent.

Indexed as

AdultBayes TheoremBrainChoice BehaviorChronic DiseaseDelay DiscountingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNicotineRewardSmokersSmokingSmoking CessationSurveys and QuestionnairesNicotineChoice consistencyfMRIIntertemporal choiceRelapseSmokingTobacco

Identifiers

PMID33216166
PMCPMC7826310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.