ArticleJAMA network open2020
Assessment of Trends in Statin Therapy for Secondary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in US Adults From 2007 to 2016.
Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 109 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adherence to Lipid-Lowering Therapies and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025 · on this mapPooled it
- Methods and validity indicators for measuring adherence to statins in secondary cardiovascular prevention: a systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Prevalence of statin intolerance: a meta-analysis.European heart journal · 2022 · on this mapPooled it
- Dyslipidemia and rupture risk of intracranial aneurysms-a systematic review.Neurosurgical review · 2021Pooled it
- Pharmacological treatment after a first myocardial infarction in Sweden-long-term adherence and prognosis.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2026Article
- Electronic Health Record Alerts to Improve Lipid Lowering After a Recent Myocardial Infarction.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026 · on this mapObservational
- Sex Differences in Pharmacologic Optimal Medical Therapy for Ischemic Heart Disease.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Temporal Trends in Lipid-Lowering Therapy Use and Adherence in Patients With Premature Coronary Artery Disease.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Measuring patient adherence in secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Inequalities in the provision of guideline-directed medical therapy following myocardial infarction: a cohort study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Application of nutrition interventions with GLP-1 based therapies: A narrative review of the challenges and solutions.Obesity pillars · 2025Review
- Systematic Review of the Discrepancies Between Guideline Recommendations on Carotid Revascularization in Patients with Symptomatic Carotid Artery Disease.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Inequity, workload, and external factors: a descriptive study on high-intensity statin prescriptions for patients with clinical cardiovascular disease and at high risk for cardiovascular disease.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Clinician underprescription of and patient nonadherence to clinical practice guideline-recommended medications for peripheral artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Statins for secondary prevention in women with atherosclerotic vascular disease: A nation-wide analysis of 24,665 women hospitalized for coronary, cerebrovascular or peripheral artery disease.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2025Article
- Health Status Improvement After Peripheral Vascular Intervention: Insights From the LIBERTY 360 Study.The American journal of cardiology · 2025Article
- Patterns and predictors of statin therapy after ischemic stroke and TIA: insights from the LIPYDS multicenter study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Observational
- Statin Use Among Women and Men Following Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- 2025 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2025Review
- Predictors and benefits of lipid-lowering therapy initiation after an atherosclerotic cardiovascular event: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is highly prevalent in the US, with studies indicating substantial rates of nonadherence to and undertreatment with statin therapy. The 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline recommended high-intensity statins for all patients age 75 years and younger with documented ASCVD in whom such therapy is tolerated, but there is limited evidence documenting population trends of statin use, adherence, and outcomes in the periods before and after the update to the guideline. Objective: To assess trends in the use, adherence, cost, and outcomes of statin therapy for secondary prevention in patients with different types of ASCVD between 2007 and 2016. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used data from the OptumLab Data Warehouse database containing privately insured and Medicare Advantage enrollees with demographic characteristics similar to the national US population. Participants were adult patients (age ≥21 years) who had their first ASCVD event between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2016. Data were characterized as belonging to 3 groups: (1) cardiovascular heart disease (CHD); (2) ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA); and (3) peripheral artery disease (PAD). Data were analyzed from July 1 to August 1, 2018. Exposures: Calendar year of the initial ASCVD event. Main Outcomes and Measures: Trends in the statin use (within 30 days of discharge from hospitalization), adherence (proportion of days covered ≥80% within the first year), cost, major adverse cardiac events (1-year cumulative risk), and statin intolerance (within the first year). Results: Of the 284 954 patients with a new ASCVD event, 128 422 (45.1%) were women; the median age was 63 years (interquartile range [IQR], 54-72 years); 207 781 (72.9%) were White. The use of statins increased from 50.3% in 2007 to 59.9% in 2016, the use of high-intensity statins increased from 25.0% to 49.2%, and the adherence increased from 58.7% to 70.5% (P < .001 for all trends). Patients with CHD were more likely to receive statins and high-intensity statins and adhere to medications than patients with ischemic stroke, TIA, or PAD despite similar observed treatment benefit. In 2016, 80.9% of patients with CHD used a statin vs 65.8% of patients with ischemic stroke or TIA and 37.5% of patients with PAD. Out-of-pocket cost per 30-day decreased from a median of $20 (interquartile range, $7.6-$31.9) in 2007 to $2 (interquartile range, $1.6-$10.0) in 2016 (P < .001) with the increasing use of generic statins (42.0% in 2007 vs 94.9% in 2016; P < .001). Major adverse cardiac events decreased from 8.9% in 2007 to 6.5% in 2016 (P < .001) whereas statin intolerance increased from 4.0% to 5.1% (P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: There have been modest improvements in the use, adherence, and cardiovascular outcomes over the past decade for statin therapy in patients with ASCVD, but a substantial and persistent treatment gap exists between patients with and without CHD, between men and women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.