Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33216024›Full record

ReviewJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2021

Design Considerations for Mobile Health Applications Targeting Older Adults.

Clara Li, Judith Neugroschl, Carolyn W Zhu, Amy Aloysi, Corbett A Schimming, Dongming Cai, Hillel Grossman, Jane Martin, Margaret Sewell, Maria Loizos and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Clara LiIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Judith NeugroschlIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Carolyn W ZhuIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Amy AloysiIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Corbett A SchimmingIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Dongming CaiIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Hillel GrossmanIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Jane MartinIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Margaret SewellIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Maria LoizosIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Xiaoyi ZengIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Mary SanoIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Research Education ComponentP30AG066514 · NIA · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Margaret Sewell · 2020 to 2026
$31.0M
Residing in the Community with Dementia at the End of Life: Understanding Hospice Use and Residential SettingP30AG028741 · NIA · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI R. Sean Morrison · 2010 to 2026
$21.9M
Research Training for the Care of Vulnerable Older Adults with Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias and Other Chronic ConditionsT32AG066598 · NIA · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Alex D Federman · 2020 to 2026
$2.3M
Evaluating Chinese-speaking community-dwelling elders in the United States with the Uniform Data SetR03AG061439 · NIA · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI LI, CLARA · 2019 to 2020
$297k
NIA NIH HHS L30 AG069159NIA NIH HHS P30 AG028741NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066514NIA NIH HHS R03 AG061439NIA NIH HHS T32 AG066598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mobile technologies are becoming ubiquitous in the world, changing the way we communicate and provide patient care and services. Some of the most compelling benefits of mobile technologies are in the areas of disease prevention, health management, and care delivery. For all the advances that are occurring in mobile health, its full potential for older adults is only starting to emerge. Yet, existing mobile health applications have design flaws that may limit usability by older adults. The aim of this paper is to review barriers and identify knowledge gaps where more research is needed to improve the accessibility of mobile health use in aging populations. The same observations might apply to those who are not elderly, including individuals suffering from severe mental or medical illnesses.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsSoftware DesignTelemedicineAgedDelivery of Health CareHumansUser-Centered DesignDesign considerationsmHealthmobile healthmobile technologyolder adults

Identifiers

PMID33216024
PMCPMC8837196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.