Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33215787›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2021

Tumor Frameshift Mutation Proportion Predicts Response to Immunotherapy in Mismatch Repair-Deficient Prostate Cancer.

Laura A Sena, Julia Fountain, Pedro Isaacsson Velho, Su Jin Lim, Hao Wang, Emily Nizialek, Nityam Rathi, Roberto Nussenzveig, Benjamin L Maughan, Miguel Gonzalez Velez and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Therapeutic targeting of mismatch repair-deficient cancers.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Immunotherapy in metastatic prostate cancer.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Microtubule regulation in cancer cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Microsatellite Instability, Tumor Mutational Burden, and Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Patients with Prostate Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Cooling inflammation while potentiating immune checkpoint inhibition: Enhancing the benefit-risk ratio of immuno-oncology therapy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Immunogenomic Landscape of Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Laura A SenaThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6724-9546
Julia FountainThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Pedro Isaacsson VelhoThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Su Jin LimThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Hao WangThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Emily NizialekThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Nityam RathiDivision of Medical Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Roberto NussenzveigDivision of Medical Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Benjamin L MaughanDivision of Medical Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Miguel Gonzalez VelezDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Ryan AshkarDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Amanda C LarsonDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Colin C PritchardDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Nabil AdraDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Alan H BryceDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Neeraj AgarwalDivision of Medical Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Drew M PardollThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
James R EshlemanThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Tamara L LotanThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Emmanuel S AntonarakisThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center · USHuntsman Cancer Institute · USIndiana University School of MedicineMayo Clinic Hospital · USUniversity of Utah · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAM George NELSON · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
Utah Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR002538 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HESS, RACHEL, MAJERSIK, JENNIFER JUHL · 2018 to 2022
$26.0M
ONCOLOGY: CHEMOTHERAPY, IMMUNOLOGY, BIOLOGYT32CA009071 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Mary Y Armanios, Nilofer S. Azad · 1985 to 2026
$12.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002538NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenomic biomarkers that predict response to anti-PD1 therapy in prostate cancer are needed. Frameshift mutations are predicted to generate more neoantigens than missense mutations; therefore, we hypothesized that the number or proportion of tumor frameshift mutations would correlate with response to anti-PD1 therapy in prostate cancer.

methodsTo enrich for response to anti-PD1 therapy, we assembled a multicenter cohort of 65 men with mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) prostate cancer. Patient characteristics and outcomes were determined by retrospective chart review. Clinical somatic DNA sequencing was used to determine tumor mutational burden (TMB), frameshift mutation burden, and frameshift mutation proportion (FSP), which were correlated to outcomes on anti-PD1 treatment. We subsequently used data from a clinical trial of pembrolizumab in patients with nonprostatic dMMR cancers of various histologies as a biomarker validation cohort.

resultsNineteen of 65 patients with dMMR metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer were treated with anti-PD1 therapy. The PSA

conclusionTumor FSP correlated with prolonged efficacy of anti-PD1 treatment among patients with dMMR cancers and may represent a new biomarker of immune checkpoint inhibitor sensitivity. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Given the modest efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) in unselected patients with advanced prostate cancer, biomarkers of ICI sensitivity are needed. To facilitate biomarker discovery, a cohort of patients with DNA mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) prostate cancer was assembled, as these patients are enriched for responses to ICI. A high response rate to anti-PD1 therapy in these patients was observed; however, these responses were not durable in most patients. Notably, tumor frameshift mutation proportion (FSP) was identified as a novel biomarker that was associated with prolonged response to anti-PD1 therapy in this cohort. This finding was validated in a separate cohort of patients with nonprostatic dMMR cancers of various primary histologies. This works suggests that FSP predicts response to anti-PD1 therapy in dMMR cancers, which should be validated prospectively in larger independent cohorts.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalProstatic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorDNA Mismatch RepairFrameshift MutationHumansImmunotherapyMaleMutationRetrospective StudiesAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBiomarkers, TumorBiomarkersImmunotherapyMismatch repair deficiencyProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID33215787
PMCPMC7873327
OpenAlexW3100867755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.