Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33215750›Full record

SynthesisMovement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society2021

Bilateral Pallidotomy for Dystonia: A Systematic Review.

Liesanne M Centen, D L Marinus Oterdoom, Marina A J Tijssen, Ivon Lesman-Leegte, Martje E van Egmond, J Marc C van Dijk

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07168850 (Focused Ultrasound Pallidotomy for Medication-Refractory Limb Dystonia), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07168850 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Focused Ultrasound Pallidotomy for Medication-Refractory Limb Dystonia (FUTURE Study)

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondazione I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Neurologico Carlo BestaRan2025 to 2027Enrolled34ConditionsLimb Dystonia, Idiopathic Dystonia, Medication-refractory Dystonia, Dystonia, FocalArmsExablate MR-guided Focused Ultrasound Pallidotomy, Sham Sham Exablate MRgFUS Pallidotomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Deep brain stimulation and pallidotomy in primary Meige syndrome: a prospective cohort study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Neurosurgical management of non-spastic movement disorders.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Liesanne M Centen *Department of Neurosurgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
D L Marinus OterdoomDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Marina A J TijssenDepartment of Neurology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Ivon Lesman-LeegteDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Martje E van EgmondDepartment of Neurology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
J Marc C van DijkDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stereotactic lesioning of the bilateral globus pallidus (GPi) was one of the first surgical treatments for medication-refractory dystonia but has largely been abandoned in clinical practice after the introduction of deep brain stimulation (DBS). However, some patients with dystonia are not eligible for DBS. Therefore, we reviewed the efficacy, safety, and sustainability of bilateral pallidotomy by conducting a systematic review of individual patient data (IPD). Guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and IPD were followed. In May 2020, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies reporting on outcome of bilateral pallidotomy for dystonia. If available, IPD were collected. In this systematic review, 100 patients from 33 articles were evaluated. Adverse events were reported in 20 patients (20%), of which 8 were permanent (8%). Pre-and postoperative Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Movement Scale scores were available for 53 patients. A clinically relevant improvement (>20%) of this score was found in 42 of 53 patients (79%). Twenty-five patients with status dystonicus (SD) were described. In all but 2 the SD resolved after bilateral pallidotomy. Seven patients experienced a relapse of SD. Median-reported follow-up was 12 months (n = 83; range: 2-180 months). Based on the current literature, bilateral pallidotomy is an effective and relatively safe procedure for certain types of dystonia, particularly in medication-refractory SD. Although due to publication bias the underreporting of negative outcomes is very likely, bilateral pallidotomy is a reasonable alternative to DBS in selected dystonia patients. © 2020 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationDystoniaDystonic DisordersMovement DisordersPallidotomyGlobus PallidusHumansTreatment Outcomepallidotomy; dystonia; safety; efficacy; sustainability

Identifiers

PMID33215750
PMCPMC8048649
OpenAlexW3101861097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.