Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33215611›Full record

ArticlePhysical biology2020

Integrating transcriptomics and bulk time course data into a mathematical framework to describe and predict therapeutic resistance in cancer.

Kaitlyn E Johnson, Grant R Howard, Daylin Morgan, Eric A Brenner, Andrea L Gardner, Russell E Durrett, William Mo, Aziz Al'Khafaji, Eduardo D Sontag, Angela M Jarrett and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Knowledge-Informed Machine Learning for Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis: A Review.IEEE transactions on automation science and engineering : a publication of the IEEE Robotics and Automation Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Applications of high-resolution clone tracking technologies in cancer.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kaitlyn E JohnsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, United States of America.
Grant R HowardDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, United States of America.
Daylin MorganDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4218-2805
Eric A BrennerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6755-0910
Andrea L GardnerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, United States of America.
Russell E DurrettDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, United States of America.
William MoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, United States of America.
Aziz Al'KhafajiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, United States of America.
Eduardo D SontagDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, 02115, United States of America.
Angela M JarrettLivestrong Cancer Institutes, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, United States of America.
Thomas E YankeelovDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, United States of America.
Amy BrockDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, United States of America.

Funding

INTEGRATING OMICS AND QUANTITATIVE IMAGING DATA IN CO-CLINICAL TRIALS TO PREDICT TREATMENT RESPONSE IN TRIPLE NEGATIVE BREAST CANCERU24CA226110 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI LEWIS, MICHAEL T., RUBIN, DANIEL L · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
Quantitative Multiscale Imaging to Optimize Cancer Treatment StrategiesR01CA186193 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI QUARANTA, VITO, RERICHA, ERIN C · 2014 to 2019
$3.1M
Comprehensive Training Program in Imaging Science and InformaticsT32EB007507 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MARKEY, MIA K, RYLANDER, HENRY GRADY · 2009 to 2024
$2.7M
Image Driven Multi-Scale Modeling to Predict Treatment Response in Breast CancerU01CA174706 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI QUARANTA, VITO, YANKEELOV, THOMAS E · 2013 to 2018
$2.5M
High resolution cell lineage tracking and isolationR21CA212928 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI BROCK, AMY · 2017 to 2019
$559k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA186193NCI NIH HHS R21 CA212928NCI NIH HHS U01 CA174706NCI NIH HHS U24 CA226110NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB007507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A significant challenge in the field of biomedicine is the development of methods to integrate the multitude of dispersed data sets into comprehensive frameworks to be used to generate optimal clinical decisions. Recent technological advances in single cell analysis allow for high-dimensional molecular characterization of cells and populations, but to date, few mathematical models have attempted to integrate measurements from the single cell scale with other types of longitudinal data. Here, we present a framework that actionizes static outputs from a machine learning model and leverages these as measurements of state variables in a dynamic model of treatment response. We apply this framework to breast cancer cells to integrate single cell transcriptomic data with longitudinal bulk cell population (bulk time course) data. We demonstrate that the explicit inclusion of the phenotypic composition estimate, derived from single cell RNA-sequencing data (scRNA-seq), improves accuracy in the prediction of new treatments with a concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) of 0.92 compared to a prediction accuracy of CCC = 0.64 when fitting on longitudinal bulk cell population data alone. To our knowledge, this is the first work that explicitly integrates single cell clonally-resolved transcriptome datasets with bulk time-course data to jointly calibrate a mathematical model of drug resistance dynamics. We anticipate this approach to be a first step that demonstrates the feasibility of incorporating multiple data types into mathematical models to develop optimized treatment regimens from data.

Indexed as

Sequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisTranscriptomeDrug Resistance, NeoplasmNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID33215611
PMCPMC8156495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.