ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2020
Integrating photoacoustic tomography into a multimodal automated breast ultrasound scanner.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical photoacoustic/ultrasound dual-modal imaging: Current status and future trends.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Review
- Denoising of pre-beamformed photoacoustic data using generative adversarial networks.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
significancePhotoacoustic tomography (PAT) is a promising emergent modality for the screening and staging of breast cancer. To minimize barriers to clinical translation, it is common to develop PAT systems based upon existing ultrasound hardware, which can entail significant design challenges in terms of light delivery. This often results in inherently non-uniform fluence within the tissue and should be accounted for during image reconstruction.
aimWe aim to integrate PAT into an automated breast ultrasound scanner with minimal change to the existing system. APPROACH: We designed and implemented an illuminator that directs spatially non-uniform light to the tissue near the acquisition plane of the imaging array. We developed a graphics processing unit-accelerated reconstruction method, which accounts for this illumination geometry by modeling the structure of the light in the sample. We quantified the performance of this system using a custom, modular photoacoustic phantom and graphite rods embedded in chicken breast tissue.
resultsOur illuminator provides a fluence of 2.5 mJ cm - 2 at the tissue surface, which was sufficient to attain a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 8 dB at 2 cm in chicken breast tissue and image 0.25-mm features at depths of up to 3 cm in a medium with moderate optical scattering. Our reconstruction scheme is 200 × faster than a CPU implementation; it provides a 25% increase in SNR at 2 cm in chicken breast tissue and lowers image error by an average of 31% at imaging depths >1.5 cm compared with a method that does not account for the inhomogeneity of the illumination or the transducer directivity.
conclusionsA fan-shaped illumination geometry is feasible for PAT; however, it is important to account for non-uniform fluence in illumination scenarios such as this. Future work will focus on increasing fluence and further optimizing the ultrasound hardware to improve SNR and overall image quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.