Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33215370›Full record

ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2021

Static and Dynamic Ocular Motor Abnormalities as Potential Biomarkers in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3.

João Lemos, Ana Novo, Cristina Duque, Inês Cunha, Joana Ribeiro, João Castelhano, Cristina Januário

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Identification of the Prodromal Symptoms and Pre-Ataxic Stage in Cerebellar Disorders: The Next Challenge.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

João Lemos *Neurology Department, Coimbra University Hospital Centre, Praceta Mota Pinto, 3000-135, Coimbra, Portugal. merrin72@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9128-7064
Ana Novo *Neurology Department, Coimbra University Hospital Centre, Praceta Mota Pinto, 3000-135, Coimbra, Portugal.
Cristina DuqueNeurology Department, Coimbra University Hospital Centre, Praceta Mota Pinto, 3000-135, Coimbra, Portugal.
Inês CunhaNeurology Department, Coimbra University Hospital Centre, Praceta Mota Pinto, 3000-135, Coimbra, Portugal.
Joana RibeiroNeurology Department, Coimbra University Hospital Centre, Praceta Mota Pinto, 3000-135, Coimbra, Portugal.
João CastelhanoCoimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research, Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra University, Coimbra, Portugal.
Cristina JanuárioNeurology Department, Coimbra University Hospital Centre, Praceta Mota Pinto, 3000-135, Coimbra, Portugal.
University of Coimbra · PTHospitais da Universidade de Coimbra · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While dynamic ocular motor abnormalities (e.g., gaze-evoked nystagmus (GEN), low optokinetic nystagmus (OKN), pursuit and vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gains, and dysmetric saccades) have been shown to be potential biomarkers in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3), the value of static abnormalities (e.g., convergent [esodeviation] and divergent strabismus [exodeviation]) is unknown. Moreover, studies on dynamic abnormalities in SCA3 usually do not take into account the existence of potential abduction-adduction asymmetries in patients with degenerative ataxia. Thirty-eight patients with genetically confirmed SCA3 (24 females; mean age ± SD, 49.8± 12.2 years) and 22 healthy controls (12 females, p = 0.589; mean age ± SD, 50.7± 12.5 years, p = 0.651) underwent clinical and video-oculographic assessment. A p value < 0.002 (between- and within-group analyses) and < 0.001 (correlation analysis) was considered significant. Patients showed larger esodeviation at distance (p < 0.001), became more esodeviated in lateral gaze (p < 0.001), and their near exodeviation correlated with scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia (SARA) score (p = 0.004). Pursuit, OKN, and VOR gains were lower in patients, both for their adducting and abducting components (p < 0.001). Saccades showed higher velocities (p < 0.001), abducting saccades showed lower amplitude (p < 0.001), and adducting saccades tended to show greater vertical bias (p = 0.018) in patients. Abducting saccades showed relatively lower velocity (p < 0.001) and lower amplitude (p = 0.015) than abducting saccades within patients. All dynamic ocular motor abnormalities except saccades correlated with SARA score, CAG repeat number, and/or disease duration (p < 0.001). Static and dynamic ocular motor abnormalities are potential biomarkers in SCA3. SCA3 studies using saccades should take into account the existence of potential abduction-adduction asymmetries.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkersDiplopiaFemaleFixation, OcularHead Impulse TestHumansMachado-Joseph DiseaseMaleMiddle AgedNystagmus, OptokineticNystagmus, PathologicOcular Motility DisordersReflex, Vestibulo-OcularSaccadesBiomarkersDiplopia: eye movementsSpinocerebellar ataxia type 3StrabismusVideo-head impulse test

Identifiers

PMID33215370
OpenAlexW3102774976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.