Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33215363›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2020

Development of EST-SSR markers for genetic diversity analysis in coconut (Cocos nucifera L.).

P Preethi, Shafeeq Rahman, S Naganeeswaran, A A Sabana, K P Gangaraj, B A Jerard, V Niral, M K Rajesh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genetic Diversity ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  10. Genetic Diversity Analysis ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

P PreethiICAR-Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Kasaragod, Kerala, India.
Shafeeq RahmanICAR-Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Kasaragod, Kerala, India.
S NaganeeswaranICAR-Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Kasaragod, Kerala, India.
A A SabanaICAR-Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Kasaragod, Kerala, India.
K P GangarajICAR-Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Kasaragod, Kerala, India.
B A JerardICAR-Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Kasaragod, Kerala, India.
V NiralICAR-Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Kasaragod, Kerala, India.
M K RajeshICAR-Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Kasaragod, Kerala, India. rajesh.mk@icar.gov.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3815-0365
Central Plantation Crops Research Institute · INUnited Arab Emirates University · AE

Funding

Indian Council of Agricultural Research ICAR-CPCRI Institute Project Code no. 1000761030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic improvement in coconut relies on exploiting the vast existing diversity among coconut accessions. Robust molecular markers are a pre-requisite for efficient characterization of genetic diversity. Microsatellites or simple sequence repeats (SSRs), mined from expressed sequence tags (ESTs), constitute an important resource for analysis of genetic diversity as they are abundant, polymorphic and represent function regions of the genome. We have identified a total of 318,528 putative EST-SSRs from 130,942 unigenes utilizing a leaf transcriptome dataset of coconut. Among the EST-SSRs, dinucleotide repeats were abundant (219,912; 69.04%) followed by trinucleotide (70,722; 22.2%) and tetra-nucleotide repeats (6281; 1.9%). Among the dinucleotide repeat motifs, the dominant repeat was AG/CT (35.87%), followed by AT/AT (18.59%), while the dominant trinucleotide repeat was AAG/CTT (4.59%). One hundred and twenty EST-SSR primer pairs were designed and utilized to amplify six DNA samples of coconut accessions. Fifty primers (41.7%) produced reproducible polymorphic fragments of expected sizes, from which a total of 10 primers were selected for the diversity assessment in 186 palms of 50 coconut accessions, comprising of 25 each of tall and dwarf accessions. A total of 137 alleles were detected with an average of 13.7 alleles per SSR locus. The number of alleles observed at each locus in the data set ranged from 7 to 22. All the loci showed 100% polymorphism with respect to the samples screened. The average observed heterozygosity was 0.46. The PIC values ranged from 0.79 (CnKGDEST129 and CnKGDEST100) to 0.91 (CnKGDEST117 and CnKGDEST122) with a mean value of 0.85, indicating the capacity of the EST-SSR markers to detect high levels of polymorphism. The cluster analysis revealed that accessions were generally clustered based on their relative similarity and irrespective of their geographic origins. The present study demonstrates the usefulness of transcriptome sequencing as a rapid and cost-effective methodology for the development of molecular markers. The EST-SSR markers generated through this study constitute useful and reliable tools for assessment of genetic diversity and marker-assisted selection in coconut.

Indexed as

Expressed Sequence TagsGenome, PlantPolymorphism, GeneticAllelesAnimalsCluster AnalysisCocosDNA, PlantDNA PrimersGenetic LociGenetic MarkersHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMicrosatellite RepeatsPhylogenyPlant LeavesSequence Analysis, DNADNA, PlantDNA PrimersGenetic MarkersClusteringCoconutEST-SSRsGenetic diversityMarkers

Identifiers

PMID33215363
OpenAlexW3104556387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.