Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33215352›Full record

SynthesisDrugs2021

Abuse and Misuse of Pregabalin and Gabapentin: A Systematic Review Update.

Kirk E Evoy, Sarvnaz Sadrameli, Jillian Contreras, Jordan R Covvey, Alyssa M Peckham, Megan D Morrison

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drugs, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04705480 (Pregabalin vs. Gabapentin on Reducing Opioid Usage in Trauma Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 118 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
118citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04705480 phase4completednot on this map

Pregabalin vs. Gabapentin on Reducing Opioid Usage in Trauma Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorCAMC Health SystemRan2021 to 2024Enrolled109ConditionsAnalgesics, Gabapentin, Injuries, NarcoticsArmsPregabalin 50mg, Gabapentin 300mg, Neither Pregabalin nor Gabapentin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

118 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

58 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kirk E EvoyCollege of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr., MC 6220, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA. evoy@uthscsa.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0913-7145
Sarvnaz SadrameliCollege of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr., MC 6220, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Jillian ContrerasCollege of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr., MC 6220, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Jordan R CovveySchool of Pharmacy, Duquesne University, 600 Forbes Avenue, 418D Mellon Hall, Pittsburgh, PA, 15282, USA.
Alyssa M PeckhamSchool of Pharmacy, Northeastern University, 140 The Fenway, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Megan D MorrisonPharmToTable, LLC, PO Box 169, Bellbrook, OH, 45440, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA 2017 systematic review (SR) identified 59 studies examining gabapentinoid (pregabalin and gabapentin) misuse/abuse. Evidence of gabapentinoid misuse/abuse has since grown substantially.

objectiveUpdate previous SR and describe new insights regarding gabapentinoid abuse.

methodsA SR of PubMed was conducted to identify studies published from 7/29/2016-8/31/2020. Four searches were performed using the following terms: "gabapentin [MeSH] OR pregabalin [MeSH] OR gabapentinoid" AND one of the following substance misuse/abuse-related terms: "substance-related disorders [MeSH]", "overdose", "abuse", or "misuse". Clinicaltrials.gov and the Cochrane Library database were searched to identify ongoing studies or similar SRs. Reference lists of included studies were reviewed to identify additional literature. All studies with novel data related to pregabalin and/or gabapentin abuse, misuse, or overdose conducted during the study period were included. Articles not written in English, review articles, and animal studies were excluded.

resultsFifty-five studies were included (29 [52.7%] from North America, 17 [30.9%] Europe, 6 [10.9%] Asia, and 3 [5.5%] Australia). Forty-six observational studies and 10 case reports/series were included (one manuscript included both). Twenty (36.4%) studied gabapentin only, 18 (32.7%) pregabalin only, and 17 (30.9%) both pregabalin/gabapentin. These studies corroborate findings from the previous SR that gabapentinoids are increasingly abused or misused to self-medicate, that gabapentinoids can produce desirable effects alone but are often used concomitantly with other drugs, and that opioid use disorder is the greatest risk factor for gabapentinoid abuse. While the original SR identified the largest studies having been published in Europe, this review identified several more generalisable US studies that have subsequently been conducted. The most concerning finding was increased evidence of associated patient harm, including increased hospital utilisation and opioid-related overdose mortality risk.

conclusionEvidence suggests that gabapentinoid misuse/abuse represents a growing trend that is causing significant patient harm. Prescribers should exercise appropriate caution with use in high-risk populations and monitor for signs of misuse or abuse.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrug OverdoseGabapentinHumansPregabalinGabapentinPregabalin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.