Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33215342›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neuro-oncology2020

The role of neuropathology in the management of newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline.

José E Velázquez Vega, Daniel J Brat, Timothy C Ryken, Jeffrey J Olson

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

José E Velázquez VegaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta and Emory University, 1001 Johnson Ferry Road, Atlanta, GA, 30342, USA. jevelaz@emory.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3601-1759
Daniel J BratDepartment of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Timothy C RykenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH, USA.
Jeffrey J OlsonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Emory University · USDartmouth College · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

target populationThese recommendations apply to adult patients with newly diagnosed or suspected glioblastoma (GBM) QUESTION : For adult patients with newly diagnosed GBM does testing for Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1 or 2 (IDH 1/2) mutations afford benefit beyond standard histopathology in providing accurate classification and outcome prognostication? Level III IDH 1/2 mutational status by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or sequencing is suggested for classification and prognostic information. Level III Non-canonical IDH 1/2 mutations are very rare in patients aged 55 or older and universal testing of variant mutations by sequence analysis is not suggested for this age range. QUESTION: For adult patients with lower grade infiltrating astrocytomas (WHO grades II and III) can the IDH-wildtype status designation supersede histopathology to predict prognosis and biologic relevance to eventual behavior as a GBM? Level III The designation of infiltrating astrocytomas (WHO grades II and III) as IDH-wildtype is not suggested as sufficient for a higher grade designation alone. Level III It is suggested that IDH-wildtype WHO grades II and III astrocytomas be tested for molecular-genetic alterations typical of IDH-wildtype GBM such as EGFR amplification, gain of chromosome 7/loss of chromosome 10 and TERT-p mutation to substantiate prediction of behavior similar to IDH-wildtype glioblastoma. Level III It is suggested that a diagnosis of diffuse astrocytic glioma, IDH-wildtype, with molecular features of GBM, WHO grade IV be rendered for infiltrating astrocytomas that lack histologic criteria of GBM but harbors molecular-genetic alterations of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma. QUESTION: For adult patients with newly diagnosed infiltrating glioma arising in the midline does testing for H3-K27M mutations provide information beyond that gained by histopathology for accurate classification and outcome prognostication? Level III It is suggested that infiltrating gliomas arising in midline anatomic locations be tested for the H3-K27M mutation as they tend to exhibit WHO grade IV behavior even if they lack histologic criteria for glioblastoma.

Indexed as

AdultBiomarkers, TumorDisease ManagementEvidence-Based PracticeGlioblastomaHumansNeuropathologyPractice Guidelines as TopicBiomarkers, TumorBiomarkerEGFRGlioblastomaH3F3AIDHImmunohistochemistryInfiltrating gliomaK27MNeuropathologyTERT promoter

Identifiers

PMID33215342
OpenAlexW3105324778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.