Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33215341›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neuro-oncology2020

Cytoreductive surgery in the management of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in adults: a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline update.

Joseph S Domino, D Ryan Ormond, Isabelle M Germano, Mairaj Sami, Timothy C Ryken, Jeffrey J Olson

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Development and validation of a multi-modality fusion deep learning model for differentiating glioblastoma from solitary brain metastases.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph S DominoDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA. jdomino@kumc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7265-4930
D Ryan OrmondDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Isabelle M GermanoDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Mairaj SamiDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Timothy C RykenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Jeffrey J OlsonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
University of Kansas · USDartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · USEmory University · USMount Sinai Medical Center · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

target populationThese recommendations apply to adults with newly diagnosed or suspected glioblastoma. QUESTION: What is the effect of extent of surgical resection on patient outcome in the initial management of adult patients with suspected newly diagnosed glioblastoma? RECOMMENDATION: Level II: Maximal cytoreductive surgery is recommended in adult patients with suspected newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastoma with gross total resection defined as removal of contrast enhancing tumor. Level III: Biopsy, subtotal resection, or gross total resection is suggested depending on medical comorbidities, functional status, and location of tumor if maximal resection may cause significant neurologic deficit. QUESTION: What is the role of cytoreductive surgery in adults with newly diagnosed bi-frontal "butterfly" glioblastoma? RECOMMENDATION: Level III: Resection of newly diagnosed bi-frontal "butterfly" glioblastoma is suggested to improve overall survival over biopsy alone. QUESTION: What is the goal of cytoreductive surgery in elderly adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma? RECOMMENDATION: Level III: Elderly patients (> 65 years) show survival benefit with gross total resection and it is suggested they undergo cytoreductive surgery. QUESTION: What is the role of advanced intraoperative guidance techniques in cytoreductive surgery in adults with newly diagnosed glioblastoma? RECOMMENDATION: Level III: The use of intraoperative guidance adjuncts such as intraoperative MRI (iMRI) or 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) are suggested to maximize extent of resection in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. There is insufficient evidence to make a suggestion on the use of fluorescein, indocyanine green, or intraoperative ultrasound.

Indexed as

AdultCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresDisease ManagementEvidence-Based PracticeGlioblastomaHumansNeurosurgical ProceduresPractice Guidelines as TopicCytoreductionGlioblastomaGuidelineSurgery

Identifiers

PMID33215341
OpenAlexW3102145434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.