Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33215289›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2020

[What actually happens … in hybrid imaging?]

C Rischpler, T Schlosser, L Umutlu, T Rassaf, B J Krause

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 81% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

C RischplerKlinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Deutschland. Christoph.Rischpler@uk-essen.de.
T SchlosserInstitut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Deutschland.
L UmutluInstitut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Deutschland.
T RassafWestdeutsches Herz- und Gefäßzentrum, Klinik für Kardiologie und Angiologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Deutschland.
B J KrauseKlinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Rostock, Deutschland.
University of Duisburg-Essen · DEEssen University Hospital · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin · DEUniversitätsmedizin Rostock · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical/methodological issueThe goal of this article is to shed light on innovations in perfusion imaging and the fields of application that have opened up in hybrid imaging of the heart. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL

methodsAs before, the most commonly used modalities in hybrid imaging are single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). Perfusion tracers and the radioactively labeled glucose analog METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: Use of PET/MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) is becoming increasingly widespread. In addition, FDG is also increasingly applied in imaging infectious and inflammatory myocardial diseases. Furthermore, novel tracers are used, such as the amyloid-specific tracers in cardiac amyloidosis. PERFORMANCE: Overall, this development has led to an increasing use of hybrid imaging techniques. These still include myocardial perfusion imaging, but are also used in inflammatory and infectious diseases such as endocarditis, myocarditis and sarcoidosis, as well as in underestimated diseases such as cardiac amyloidosis. The use of tracers has led to the creation of new fields of application in hybrid imaging. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Hybrid imaging combining myocardial perfusion and coronary visualization seems to be particularly advantageous in complex cases such as multivessel disease. In infectious and inflammatory myocardial diseases, FDG PET/CT or PET/MRI has clearly demonstrated its added value. New fields of application are very promising, but their significance has yet to be clearly demonstrated.

Indexed as

Positron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyFluorodeoxyglucose F18Multimodal ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedFluorodeoxyglucose F18AmyloidosisHeart diseasesMyocarditisPositron emission tomographyRadioactive tracers

Identifiers

PMID33215289
OpenAlexW3105393525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.