Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33215269›Full record

SynthesisPsychopharmacology2021

Dopaminergic modulation of reward discounting in healthy rats: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jaime J Castrellon, James Meade, Lucy Greenwald, Katlyn Hurst, Gregory R Samanez-Larkin

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Psychopharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Dopamine and Temporal Discounting: Revisiting Pharmacology and Individual Differences.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. eLife · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Rational inattention and tonic dopamine.PLoS computational biology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jaime J CastrellonDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. jaime.castrellon@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5834-7101
James MeadeCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Box 90999, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Lucy GreenwaldCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Box 90999, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Katlyn HurstCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Box 90999, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Gregory R Samanez-LarkinDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleAlthough numerous studies have suggested that pharmacological alteration of the dopamine (DA) system modulates reward discounting, these studies have produced inconsistent findings.

objectivesHere, we conducted a systematic review and pre-registered meta-analysis to evaluate DA drug-mediated effects on reward discounting of time, probability, and effort costs in studies of healthy rats. This produced a total of 1343 articles to screen for inclusion/exclusion. From the literature, we identified 117 effects from approximately 1549 individual rats.

methodsUsing random effects with maximum-likelihood estimation, we meta-analyzed placebo-controlled drug effects for (1) DA D1-like receptor agonists and (2) antagonists, (3) D2-like agonists and (4) antagonists, and (5) DA transporter-modulating drugs.

resultsMeta-analytic effects showed that DAT-modulating drugs decreased reward discounting. While D1-like and D2-like antagonists both increased discounting, agonist drugs for those receptors had no significant effect on discounting behavior. A number of these effects appear contingent on study design features like cost type, rat strain, and microinfusion location.

conclusionsThese findings suggest a nuanced relationship between DA and discounting behavior and urge caution when drawing generalizations about the effects of pharmacologically manipulating dopamine on reward-based decision-making.

Indexed as

RewardAnimalsBiological TransportBrainDecision MakingDelay DiscountingDopamine AgonistsDopamine AntagonistsDose-Response Relationship, DrugMaleRatsReceptors, Dopamine D1Receptors, Dopamine D2Dopamine AgonistsDopamine AntagonistsReceptors, Dopamine D1Receptors, Dopamine D2Decision-makingDelayDiscountingDopamineEffortMeta-analysisPharmacologyProbability

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.