Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33215124›Full record

ArticleBone & joint open2020

Reliability of the Oswestry-Bristol Classification for trochlear dysplasia: expanded characteristics.

Christian Konrads, Christoph Gonser, Sufian S Ahmad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Patellar Tracking: An Old Problem with New Insights.Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christian KonradsDepartment of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Klinik, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Christoph GonserDepartment of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Klinik, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Sufian S AhmadDepartment of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Klinik, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe Oswestry-Bristol Classification (OBC) was recently described as an MRI-based classification tool for the femoral trochlear. The authors demonstrated better inter- and intraobserver agreement compared to the Dejour classification. As the OBC could potentially provide a very useful MRI-based grading system for trochlear dysplasia, it was the aim to determine the inter- and intraobserver reliability of the classification system from the perspective of the non-founder.

methodsTwo orthopaedic surgeons independently assessed 50 MRI scans for trochlear dysplasia and classified each according to the OBC. Both observers repeated the assessments after six weeks. The inter- and intraobserver agreement was determined using Cohen's kappa statistic and S-statistic nominal and linear weights.

resultsThe OBC with grading into four different trochlear forms showed excellent inter- and intraobserver agreement with a mean kappa of 0.78.

conclusionThe OBC is a simple MRI-based classification system with high inter- and intraobserver reliability. It could present a useful tool for grading the severity of trochlear dysplasia in daily practice.Cite this article:

Indexed as

anterior knee painkneeMPFLpatella dislocationpatella instabilitypatellofemoral jointtrochleoplasty

Identifiers

PMID33215124
PMCPMC7659693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.