ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2020
Clinical and genetic analysis of Ser341Pro
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving the Yield of Genetic Diagnosis through Additional Genetic Panel Testing in Hereditary Ophthalmic Diseases.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Article
- Common and rare myocilin variants: Predicting glaucoma pathogenicity based on genetics, clinical, and laboratory misfolding data.Human mutation · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo report the first discovery of Ser341Pro
methodsTen family members from three generations participated in this study and received the thorough ophthalmologic examination. Focused exome sequencing on a proband was performed to confirm the target mutations (
resultsA nucleotide change from thymine to cytosine at c.1021T>C was found in eight family members. Three members diagnosed with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) were characterized by severe clinical presentations, high intraocular pressure, and poor response to medical treatment (100% of the patient required filtering surgery). On variant analysis by ACMG/AMP guidelines, Ser341Pro is not found in normal population. Multiple computational predictive programs support a deleterious effect of Ser341Pro variant (PolyPhen 2, SIFT, Mutation Taster). Ser341Pro could be involved in moderate (PM) and supporting (PP) criteria (PM1, PM2, PP2, PP3). Combining the criteria, Ser341Pro has a combination of 2 moderate (PM1+PM2) and 2 supporting (PP2+PP3) criteria, which is interpreted to "likely pathogenic".
conclusionThe Ser341Pro variant is correlated with severe phenotype of POAG. There are similar clinical aspects to previous studies: autosomal dominant inheritance, incomplete penetrance (62.50% and 66.67%), and proportion of patients requiring trabeculectomy (100% in both study). According to ACMG/AMP guidelines and the previous basic researches, the Ser341Pro variant had a "strong evidence of pathogenicity (PS3)" and then it could be interpreted to "pathogenic (PS3, PM1, PM2, PP2, PP3)". Additionally, Ser341Pro variant can be reported as "c.1021T>C (p.Ser341Pro), likely pathogenic, POAG, autosomal dominant" according to guideline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.