Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33214794›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2020

CRISPR-Cas12a (Cpf1): A Versatile Tool in the Plant Genome Editing Tool Box for Agricultural Advancement.

Anindya Bandyopadhyay, Nagesh Kancharla, Vivek S Javalkote, Santanu Dasgupta, Thomas P Brutnell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Development of a CRISPR/Cas12a genome editing toolbox inSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  10. From Lab to Field: CRISPRing Major CultivatedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Engineering and comparison of cas12a-based genome editing systems in plants.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anindya BandyopadhyayReliance Industries Ltd., R&D-Synthetic Biology, Navi Mumbai, India.
Nagesh KancharlaReliance Industries Ltd., R&D-Synthetic Biology, Navi Mumbai, India.
Vivek S JavalkoteReliance Industries Ltd., R&D-Synthetic Biology, Navi Mumbai, India.
Santanu DasguptaReliance Industries Ltd., R&D-Synthetic Biology, Navi Mumbai, India.
Thomas P BrutnellChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology Research Institute, Beijing China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global population is predicted to approach 10 billion by 2050, an increase of over 2 billion from today. To meet the demands of growing, geographically and socio-economically diversified nations, we need to diversity and expand agricultural production. This expansion of agricultural productivity will need to occur under increasing biotic, and environmental constraints driven by climate change. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-site directed nucleases (CRISPR-SDN) and similar genome editing technologies will likely be key enablers to meet future agricultural needs. While the application of CRISPR-Cas9 mediated genome editing has led the way, the use of CRISPR-Cas12a is also increasing significantly for genome engineering of plants. The popularity of the CRISPR-Cas12a, the type V (class-II) system, is gaining momentum because of its versatility and simplified features. These include the use of a small guide RNA devoid of trans-activating crispr RNA, targeting of T-rich regions of the genome where Cas9 is not suitable for use, RNA processing capability facilitating simpler multiplexing, and its ability to generate double strand breaks (DSB) with staggered ends. Many monocot and dicot species have been successfully edited using this Cas12a system and further research is ongoing to improve its efficiency in plants, including improving the temperature stability of the Cas12a enzyme, identifying new variants of Cas12a or synthetically producing Cas12a with flexible PAM sequences. In this review we provide a comparative survey of CRISPR-Cas12a and Cas9, and provide a perspective on applications of CRISPR-Cas12 in agriculture.

Indexed as

agriculturebase editingCas12aCas9CRISPRNHEJPAMtemperature sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID33214794
PMCPMC7668199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.