Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33214766›Full record

ArticleCurrent genomics2020

Whole Genome Re-sequencing of Soybean Accession EC241780 Providing Genomic Landscape of Candidate Genes Involved in Rust Resistance.

Milind Balkrishna Ratnaparkhe, Niharika Marmat, Giriraj Kumawat, Maranna Shivakumar, Viraj Gangadhar Kamble, Vennampally Nataraj, Shunmugiah Veluchamy Ramesh, Milind Panjabrao Deshmukh, Ajay Kumar Singh, Humira Sonah and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Combating Root-Knot Nematodes (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Milind Balkrishna Ratnaparkhe1 ICAR-Indian Institute of Soybean Research, Indore-452001, MP, India; 2School of Life Sciences, Devi Ahilya University, Indore, MP, India; 3Agricultural Research Station, (MPKV), Kasbe Digraj, Sangli, MS, India; 4ICAR-National Institute of Abiotic Stress Management, Baramati, MS, India; 5National Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Mohali, India; 6National Institute of Plant Genome Research, New Delhi, India.
Niharika Marmat1 ICAR-Indian Institute of Soybean Research, Indore-452001, MP, India; 2School of Life Sciences, Devi Ahilya University, Indore, MP, India; 3Agricultural Research Station, (MPKV), Kasbe Digraj, Sangli, MS, India; 4ICAR-National Institute of Abiotic Stress Management, Baramati, MS, India; 5National Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Mohali, India; 6National Institute of Plant Genome Research, New Delhi, India.
Giriraj Kumawat1 ICAR-Indian Institute of Soybean Research, Indore-452001, MP, India; 2School of Life Sciences, Devi Ahilya University, Indore, MP, India; 3Agricultural Research Station, (MPKV), Kasbe Digraj, Sangli, MS, India; 4ICAR-National Institute of Abiotic Stress Management, Baramati, MS, India; 5National Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Mohali, India; 6National Institute of Plant Genome Research, New Delhi, India.
Maranna Shivakumar1 ICAR-Indian Institute of Soybean Research, Indore-452001, MP, India; 2School of Life Sciences, Devi Ahilya University, Indore, MP, India; 3Agricultural Research Station, (MPKV), Kasbe Digraj, Sangli, MS, India; 4ICAR-National Institute of Abiotic Stress Management, Baramati, MS, India; 5National Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Mohali, India; 6National Institute of Plant Genome Research, New Delhi, India.
Viraj Gangadhar Kamble1 ICAR-Indian Institute of Soybean Research, Indore-452001, MP, India; 2School of Life Sciences, Devi Ahilya University, Indore, MP, India; 3Agricultural Research Station, (MPKV), Kasbe Digraj, Sangli, MS, India; 4ICAR-National Institute of Abiotic Stress Management, Baramati, MS, India; 5National Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Mohali, India; 6National Institute of Plant Genome Research, New Delhi, India.
Vennampally Nataraj1 ICAR-Indian Institute of Soybean Research, Indore-452001, MP, India; 2School of Life Sciences, Devi Ahilya University, Indore, MP, India; 3Agricultural Research Station, (MPKV), Kasbe Digraj, Sangli, MS, India; 4ICAR-National Institute of Abiotic Stress Management, Baramati, MS, India; 5National Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Mohali, India; 6National Institute of Plant Genome Research, New Delhi, India.
Shunmugiah Veluchamy Ramesh1 ICAR-Indian Institute of Soybean Research, Indore-452001, MP, India; 2School of Life Sciences, Devi Ahilya University, Indore, MP, India; 3Agricultural Research Station, (MPKV), Kasbe Digraj, Sangli, MS, India; 4ICAR-National Institute of Abiotic Stress Management, Baramati, MS, India; 5National Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Mohali, India; 6National Institute of Plant Genome Research, New Delhi, India.
Milind Panjabrao Deshmukh1 ICAR-Indian Institute of Soybean Research, Indore-452001, MP, India; 2School of Life Sciences, Devi Ahilya University, Indore, MP, India; 3Agricultural Research Station, (MPKV), Kasbe Digraj, Sangli, MS, India; 4ICAR-National Institute of Abiotic Stress Management, Baramati, MS, India; 5National Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Mohali, India; 6National Institute of Plant Genome Research, New Delhi, India.
Ajay Kumar Singh1 ICAR-Indian Institute of Soybean Research, Indore-452001, MP, India; 2School of Life Sciences, Devi Ahilya University, Indore, MP, India; 3Agricultural Research Station, (MPKV), Kasbe Digraj, Sangli, MS, India; 4ICAR-National Institute of Abiotic Stress Management, Baramati, MS, India; 5National Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Mohali, India; 6National Institute of Plant Genome Research, New Delhi, India.
Humira Sonah1 ICAR-Indian Institute of Soybean Research, Indore-452001, MP, India; 2School of Life Sciences, Devi Ahilya University, Indore, MP, India; 3Agricultural Research Station, (MPKV), Kasbe Digraj, Sangli, MS, India; 4ICAR-National Institute of Abiotic Stress Management, Baramati, MS, India; 5National Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Mohali, India; 6National Institute of Plant Genome Research, New Delhi, India.
Rupesh Kailasrao Deshmukh1 ICAR-Indian Institute of Soybean Research, Indore-452001, MP, India; 2School of Life Sciences, Devi Ahilya University, Indore, MP, India; 3Agricultural Research Station, (MPKV), Kasbe Digraj, Sangli, MS, India; 4ICAR-National Institute of Abiotic Stress Management, Baramati, MS, India; 5National Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Mohali, India; 6National Institute of Plant Genome Research, New Delhi, India.
Manoj Prasad1 ICAR-Indian Institute of Soybean Research, Indore-452001, MP, India; 2School of Life Sciences, Devi Ahilya University, Indore, MP, India; 3Agricultural Research Station, (MPKV), Kasbe Digraj, Sangli, MS, India; 4ICAR-National Institute of Abiotic Stress Management, Baramati, MS, India; 5National Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Mohali, India; 6National Institute of Plant Genome Research, New Delhi, India.
Suresh Chand1 ICAR-Indian Institute of Soybean Research, Indore-452001, MP, India; 2School of Life Sciences, Devi Ahilya University, Indore, MP, India; 3Agricultural Research Station, (MPKV), Kasbe Digraj, Sangli, MS, India; 4ICAR-National Institute of Abiotic Stress Management, Baramati, MS, India; 5National Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Mohali, India; 6National Institute of Plant Genome Research, New Delhi, India.
Sanjay Gupta1 ICAR-Indian Institute of Soybean Research, Indore-452001, MP, India; 2School of Life Sciences, Devi Ahilya University, Indore, MP, India; 3Agricultural Research Station, (MPKV), Kasbe Digraj, Sangli, MS, India; 4ICAR-National Institute of Abiotic Stress Management, Baramati, MS, India; 5National Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Mohali, India; 6National Institute of Plant Genome Research, New Delhi, India.
Indian Institute of Soybean Research · INNational Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute · INDevi Ahilya Vishwavidyalaya · INNational Institute of Abiotic Stress Management · INNational Institute of Plant Genome Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this study, whole genome re-sequencing of rust resistant soybean genotype EC241780 was performed to understand the genomic landscape involved in the resistance mechanism.

methodsA total of 374 million raw reads were obtained with paired-end sequencing performed with Illumina HiSeq 2500 instrument, out of which 287.3 million high quality reads were mapped to Williams 82 reference genome. Comparative sequence analysis of EC241780 with rust susceptible cultivars Williams 82 and JS 335 was performed to identify sequence variation and to prioritise the candidate genes.

resultsComparative analysis indicates that genotype EC241780 has high sequence similarity with rust resistant genotype PI 200492 and the resistance in EC241780 is conferred by the

conclusionThe study provides insights of genome-wide sequence variation more particularly at

Indexed as

disease resistancePhakopsora pachyrhizirustsingle nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)Soybeanwhole genome re-sequencing

Identifiers

PMID33214766
PMCPMC7604744
OpenAlexW3093919839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.