Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33214647›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Brassica oleracea var. acephala (kale) improvement by biological activity of root endophytic fungi.

Jorge Poveda, Iñigo Zabalgogeazcoa, Pilar Soengas, Victor M Rodríguez, M Elena Cartea, Rosaura Abilleira, Pablo Velasco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Bioremediation Potential of Leaf Endophytic Fungi inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Endophytic fungi from kale (Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jorge PovedaBiological Mission of Galicia (CSIC), Pontevedra, Spain.
Iñigo ZabalgogeazcoaInstitute of Natural Resources and Agrobiology of Salamanca (CSIC), Salamanca, Spain.
Pilar SoengasBiological Mission of Galicia (CSIC), Pontevedra, Spain.
Victor M RodríguezBiological Mission of Galicia (CSIC), Pontevedra, Spain.
M Elena CarteaBiological Mission of Galicia (CSIC), Pontevedra, Spain.
Rosaura AbilleiraBiological Mission of Galicia (CSIC), Pontevedra, Spain.
Pablo VelascoBiological Mission of Galicia (CSIC), Pontevedra, Spain. pvelasco@mbg.csic.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brassica oleracea var. acephala (kale) is a cruciferous vegetable widely cultivated for its leaves and flower buds in Atlantic Europe and the Mediterranean area, being a food of great interest as a "superfood" today. Little has been studied about the diversity of endophytic fungi in the Brassica genus, and there are no studies regarding kale. In this study, we made a survey of the diversity of endophytic fungi present in the roots of six different Galician kale local populations. In addition, we investigated whether the presence of endophytes in the roots was beneficial to the plants in terms of growth, cold tolerance, or resistance to bacteria and insects. The fungal isolates obtained belonged to 33 different taxa. Among those, a Fusarium sp. and Pleosporales sp. A between Setophoma and Edenia (called as Setophoma/Edenia) were present in many plants of all five local populations, being possible components of a core kale microbiome. For the first time, several interactions between endophytic fungus and Brassica plants are described and is proved how different interactions are beneficial for the plant. Fusarium sp. and Pleosporales sp. B close to Pyrenophora (called as Pyrenophora) promoted plant growth and increased cold tolerance. On the other hand, isolates of Trichoderma sp., Pleosporales sp. C close to Phialocephala (called as Phialocephala), Fusarium sp., Curvularia sp., Setophoma/Edenia and Acrocalymma sp. were able to activate plant systemic resistance against the bacterial pathogen Xanthomonas campestris. We also observed that Fusarium sp., Curvularia sp. and Setophoma/Edenia confered resistance against Mamestra brassicae larvae.

Indexed as

BrassicaEndophytesFusariumPlant Roots

Identifiers

PMID33214647
PMCPMC7678862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.