ArticleScientific reports2020
Influence of implantations of extended depth-of-focus on standard automated perimetry.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Standard Automated Perimetry Before and After Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens Implantation: Longitudinal Changes in Global Indices and Test Reliability.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Premium Intraocular Lenses and Their Impact on Visual Field Assessment: A Narrative Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
- Efficacy and safety of the enhanced monofocal intraocular lens in glaucoma of varying severity.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Clinical outcomes of an extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens in patients with glaucoma.International ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Influence of Visual Field on Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity in Open-Angle Glaucoma Eyes with Monofocal and Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2024Article
- Visual Function after Implantation of Diffractive Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses in Eyes with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2023Article
- Comparison of the Visual Outcomes of Enhanced and Standard Monofocal Intraocular Lens Implantations in Eyes with Early Glaucoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Longitudinal evaluation of trifocal and extended depth of focus lenses implantation using standard automated perimetry parameters.International ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Implantation of diffractive extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses in normal tension glaucoma eyes: A case series.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2023Article
- Comparison of visual performance between bifocal and extended-depth-of-focus intraocular lenses.PloS one · 2023Article
- Influence of implantation of diffractive trifocal intraocular lenses on standard automated perimetry.BMC ophthalmology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This prospective study aimed to investigate the influence of an extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens (EDOF IOL) on standard automated perimetry. Ninety eyes of 90 patients who had undergone cataract surgery from February 2018 to December 2018 were included. No patients had any diseases that might affect the visual field. ZMB00 (+ 4.00 D add), ZXR00V (+ 1.75 D add), and ZCB00V (Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Santa Ana, CA, USA) were used as multifocal, EDOF, and monofocal IOLs, respectively. Humphrey Visual Field 10-2 testing was performed 2-3 months after cataract surgery, acceptable reliability indices were measured, and mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), foveal sensitivity and mean sensitivity (MS) were compared. Seventy-one eyes (ZXR00V: 24 eyes, ZMB00: 25 eyes, ZCB00V: 22 eyes) were used for the analyses. The MD and MS of the EDOF and monofocal groups were significantly higher than those of the multifocal group (P < 0.0051). However, the MD and MS of the EDOF and monofocal groups were not different (P > 0.23). The PSD and foveal sensitivity were not different among the groups. In non-glaucomatous patients, the MD and MS of the EDOF IOL were comparable to those of the monofocal IOL and better than those of the multifocal IOL.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.