Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33214621›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Episiotomy practices in France: epidemiology and risk factors in non-operative vaginal deliveries.

Christophe Clesse, Jonathan Cottenet, Joelle Lighezzolo-Alnot, Karine Goueslard, Michele Scheffler, Paul Sagot, Catherine Quantin

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Early detection of perinatal depression in couples: a single-center prospective study.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Christophe ClesseCentre for Psychiatry, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts & The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary, University of London, Old Anatomy Building Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK.
Jonathan CottenetBiostatistics and Bioinformatics (DIM), University Hospital, University of Burgundy and Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.
Joelle Lighezzolo-AlnotPsychologie Clinique, Interpsy Laboratory (EA4432), Lorraine University, Nancy, France.
Karine GoueslardBiostatistics and Bioinformatics (DIM), University Hospital, University of Burgundy and Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.
Michele SchefflerObstetricial Gynecologist, Endocrinologist, Gynecologist, The FNCGM (National Federation of Gynecology Medical Colleges), Cabinet de Gynécologie Médicale Et Obstétrique, 21 avenue Foch, 54000, Nancy, France.
Paul SagotDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Dijon, France.
Catherine QuantinBiostatistics and Bioinformatics (DIM), University Hospital, University of Burgundy and Franche-Comté, Dijon, France. catherine.quantin@chu-dijon.fr.
Université de Bourgogne · FRInterpsyMaison des Sciences de l’Homme de Dijon · FRUniversité de Lorraine · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Episiotomy use has decreased due to the lack of evidence on its protective effects from maternal obstetric anal sphincter injuries. Indications for episiotomy vary considerably and there are a great variety of factors associated with its use. The aim of this article is to describe the episiotomy rate in France between 2013 and 2017 and the factors associated with its use in non-operative vaginal deliveries. In this retrospective population-based cohort study, we included vaginal deliveries performed in French hospitals (N = 584) and for which parity was coded. The variable of interest was the rate of episiotomy, particularly for non-operative vaginal deliveries. Trends in the episiotomy rates were studied using the Cochran-Armitage test. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with episiotomy according to maternal age and parity. Between 2013 and 2017, French episiotomy rates fell from 21.6 to 14.3% for all vaginal deliveries (p < 0.01), and from 15.5 to 9.3% (p < 0.01) for all non-operative vaginal deliveries. Among non-operative vaginal deliveries, epidural analgesia, non-reassuring fetal heart rate, meconium in the amniotic fluid, shoulder dystocia, and newborn weight (≥ 4,000 g) were risk factors for episiotomy, both for nulliparous and multiparous women. On the contrary, prematurity reduced the risk of its use. For nulliparous women, breech presentation was also a risk factor for episiotomy, and for multiparous women, scarred uterus and multiple pregnancies were risk factors. In France, despite a reduction in episiotomy use over the last few years, the factors associated with episiotomy have not changed and are similar to the literature. This suggests that the decrease in episiotomies in France is an overall tendency which is probably related to improved care strategies that have been relayed by hospital teams and perinatal networks.

Indexed as

AdultEpisiotomyFemaleFranceHumansInfant, NewbornPractice Patterns, Physicians'PregnancyRetrospective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID33214621
PMCPMC7677317
OpenAlexW3104873600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.