Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33214618›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Alternation of inverse problem approach and deep learning for lens-free microscopy image reconstruction.

L Hervé, D C A Kraemer, O Cioni, O Mandula, M Menneteau, S Morales, C Allier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

L HervéUniv. Grenoble Alpes, CEA, LETI, DTBS, 38000, Grenoble, France.
D C A KraemerUniv. Grenoble Alpes, CEA, LETI, DTBS, 38000, Grenoble, France.
O CioniUniv. Grenoble Alpes, CEA, LETI, DTBS, 38000, Grenoble, France.
O MandulaUniv. Grenoble Alpes, CEA, LETI, DTBS, 38000, Grenoble, France.
M MenneteauUniv. Grenoble Alpes, CEA, LETI, DTBS, 38000, Grenoble, France.
S MoralesUniv. Grenoble Alpes, CEA, LETI, DTBS, 38000, Grenoble, France.
C AllierUniv. Grenoble Alpes, CEA, LETI, DTBS, 38000, Grenoble, France. cedric.allier@cea.fr.
Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FRLaboratoire d'Électronique des Technologies de l'Information · FRCEA Grenoble · FRUniversité Grenoble Alpes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A lens-free microscope is a simple imaging device performing in-line holographic measurements. In the absence of focusing optics, a reconstruction algorithm is used to retrieve the sample image by solving the inverse problem. This is usually performed by optimization algorithms relying on gradient computation. However the presence of local minima leads to unsatisfactory convergence when phase wrapping errors occur. This is particularly the case in large optical thickness samples, for example cells in suspension and cells undergoing mitosis. To date, the occurrence of phase wrapping errors in the holographic reconstruction limits the application of lens-free microscopy in live cell imaging. To overcome this issue, we propose a novel approach in which the reconstruction alternates between two approaches, an inverse problem optimization and deep learning. The computation starts with a first reconstruction guess of the cell sample image. The result is then fed into a neural network, which is trained to correct phase wrapping errors. The neural network prediction is next used as the initialization of a second and last reconstruction step, which corrects to a certain extent the neural network prediction errors. We demonstrate the applicability of this approach in solving the phase wrapping problem occurring with cells in suspension at large densities. This is a challenging sample that typically cannot be reconstructed without phase wrapping errors, when using inverse problem optimization alone.

Identifiers

PMID33214618
PMCPMC7678858
OpenAlexW3103652317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.