ArticleScientific reports2020
Full wave 3D inverse scattering transmission ultrasound tomography in the presence of high contrast.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multidimensional Quality Evaluation of Imaging Performance for Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Computed Tomography System.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Inverse scattering in biological samples via beam propagation.Science advances · 2026Article
- CUCT-Net: End-to-End Signal-to-Image Learning for Quantized Speed-of-Sound Estimation and Tissue Segmentation in Ultrasound Computed Tomography.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Survey of Deep Learning and Physics-Based Approaches in Computational Wave Imaging.Proceedings of the IEEE. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · 2025Article
- Deep-Learning-Driven High Spatial Resolution Attenuation Imaging for Ultrasound Tomography (AI-UT).IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2025Article
- Angular spatial compounding of diffraction corrected images improves ultrasound attenuation measurements.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2025Article
- Breast Glandular and Ductal Volume Changes during the Menstrual Cycle: A Study in 48 Breasts Using Ultralow-Frequency Transmitted Ultrasound Tomography/Volography.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024Article
- Spectral-based Quantitative Ultrasound Imaging Processing Techniques: Comparisons of RF Versus IQ Approaches.Ultrasonic imaging · 2024Article
- In vivo noninvasive systemic myography of acute systemic vasoactivity in female pregnant mice.Nature communications · 2023Article
- A Forward Model Incorporating Elevation-Focused Transducer Properties for 3-D Full-Waveform Inversion in Ultrasound Computed Tomography.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2023Article
- Low frequency 3D transmission ultrasound tomography: technical details and clinical implications.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2023Article
- Full Wave Inversion and Inverse Scattering in Ultrasound Tomography/Volography.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023Article
- An Experimental Ultrasound System for Qualitative Tomographic Imaging.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- 3-D Stochastic Numerical Breast Phantoms for Enabling Virtual Imaging Trials of Ultrasound Computed Tomography.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We present here a quantitative ultrasound tomographic method yielding a sub-mm resolution, quantitative 3D representation of tissue characteristics in the presence of high contrast media. This result is a generalization of previous work where high impedance contrast was not present and may provide a clinically and laboratory relevant, relatively inexpensive, high resolution imaging method for imaging in the presence of bone. This allows tumor, muscle, tendon, ligament or cartilage disease monitoring for therapy and general laboratory or clinical settings. The method has proven useful in breast imaging and is generalized here to high-resolution quantitative imaging in the presence of bone. The laboratory data are acquired in ~ 12 min and the reconstruction in ~ 24 min-approximately 200 times faster than previously reported simulations in the literature. Such fast reconstructions with real data require careful calibration, adequate data redundancy from a 2D array of 2048 elements and a paraxial approximation. The imaging results show that tissue surrounding the high impedance region is artifact free and has correct speed of sound at sub-mm resolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.