ArticleScientific data2020
Gen-FS coordinated proficiency test data for genomic foodborne pathogen surveillance, 2017 and 2018 exercises.
Article in Scientific data, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Salmonella Isolates from Food Production Environments and Clinical Sources in the Middle East: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Revealing the Limited Comparative Genomic Evidence.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- GWAS Study Applied to Phenotypically Slow Growth Strains ofMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Advancing microbial risk assessment: perspectives from the evolution of detection technologies.NPJ science of food · 2025Review
- Genomic Characterization ofMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Insights into the Evolution of IncR Plasmids Found in the Southern European Clone of the Monophasic Variant ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Using domain adaptation for classification of healthy and disease conditions from mobile-captured images of standard 12-lead electrocardiograms.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Results of the 2020 Genomic Proficiency Test for the network of European Union Reference Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance assessing whole-genome-sequencing capacities.Microbial genomics · 2023Article
- Alteration of a Shiga toxin-encoding phage associated with a change in toxin production level and disease severity inMicrobial genomics · 2023Article
- Impact of wet-lab protocols on quality of whole-genome short-read sequences from foodborne microbial pathogens.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Evaluation of five commercial DNA extraction kits usingAccess microbiology · 2023Article
- First Report of Septicaemic Listeriosis in a Loggerhead Sea Turtle (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Using Genomics to Understand the Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases in the Northern Territory of Australia.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The US PulseNet and GenomeTrakr laboratory networks work together within the Genomics for Food Safety (Gen-FS) consortium to collect and analyze genomic data for foodborne pathogen surveillance (species include Salmonella enterica, Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli (STECs), and Campylobactor). In 2017 these two laboratory networks started harmonizing their respective proficiency test exercises, agreeing on distributing a single strain-set and following the same standard operating procedure (SOP) for genomic data collection, running a jointly coordinated annual proficiency test exercise. In this data release we are publishing the reference genomes and raw data submissions for the 2017 and 2018 proficiency test exercises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.