Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33214534›Full record

ArticleTransplantation2021

Immunosuppression Regimen Use and Outcomes in Older and Younger Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients: A National Registry Analysis.

Krista L Lentine, Wisit Cheungpasitporn, Huiling Xiao, Mara McAdams-DeMarco, Ngan N Lam, Dorry L Segev, Sunjae Bae, JiYoon B Ahn, Gregory P Hess, Yasar Caliskan and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Krista L LentineSaint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO.
Wisit CheungpasitpornUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS.
Huiling XiaoSaint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO.
Mara McAdams-DeMarcoJohns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Ngan N LamUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Dorry L SegevJohns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Sunjae BaeJohns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
JiYoon B AhnJohns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Gregory P HessDrexel University, Philadelphia, PA.
Yasar CaliskanSaint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO.
Henry B RandallSaint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO.
Bertram L KasiskeHennepin County Med Center, Minneapolis, MN.
Mark A SchnitzlerSaint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO.
David A AxelrodUniversity of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
Saint Louis University · USJohns Hopkins University · USDrexel University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Iowa · USUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center · US

Funding

Developing personalized immunosuppression for older kidney transplant recipientsR01DK120518 · NIDDK · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MCADAMS DEMARCO, MARA A. · 2019 to 2022
$2.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK120518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the population of older transplant recipients has increased dramatically, there are limited data describing the impact of immunosuppression regimen choice on outcomes in this recipient group.

methodsNational data for US Medicare-insured adult kidney recipients (N = 67 362; 2005-2016) were examined to determine early immunosuppression regimen and associations with acute rejection, death-censored graft failure, and mortality using multivariable regression analysis in younger (18-64 y) and older (>65 y) adults.

resultsThe use of antithymocyte globulin (TMG) or alemtuzumab (ALEM) induction with triple maintenance immunosuppression (reference) was less common in older compared with younger (36.9% versus 47.0%) recipients, as was TMG/ALEM + steroid avoidance (19.2% versus 20.1%) and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTORi)-based (6.7% versus 7.7%) treatments. Conversely, older patients were more likely to receive interleukin (IL)-2-receptor antibody (IL2rAb) + triple maintenance (21.1% versus 14.7%), IL2rAb + steroid avoidance (4.1% versus 1.8%), and cyclosporine-based (8.3% versus 6.6%) immunosuppression. Compared with older recipients treated with TMG/ALEM + triple maintenance (reference regimen), those managed with TMG/ALEM + steroid avoidance (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.440.520.61) and IL2rAb + steroid avoidance (aOR, 0.390.550.79) had lower risk of acute rejection. Older patients experienced more death-censored graft failure when managed with Tac + antimetabolite avoidance (adjusted hazard [aHR], 1.411.782.25), mTORi-based (aHR, 1.702.142.71), and cyclosporine-based (aHR, 1.411.782.25) regimens, versus the reference regimen. mTORi-based and cyclosporine-based regimens were associated with increased mortality in both older and younger patients.

conclusionsLower-intensity immunosuppression regimens (eg, steroid-sparing) appear beneficial for older kidney transplant recipients, while mTORi and cyclosporine-based maintenance immunosuppression are associated with higher risk of adverse outcomes.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAlemtuzumabAntilymphocyte SerumFemaleGraft RejectionHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsKidney TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedReceptors, Interleukin-2RegistriesAlemtuzumabAntilymphocyte SerumImmunosuppressive AgentsReceptors, Interleukin-2

Identifiers

PMID33214534
PMCPMC10576532
OpenAlexW3103340514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.