Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33214231›Full record

ArticleBMJ open gastroenterology2020

Semiautomated Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score helps direct bed placement for patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Drew B Schembre, Robson E Ely, Janice M Connolly, Kunjali T Padhya, Rohit Sharda, John J Brandabur

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06500468 (Usage of Novel Blood Sensing Capsule in Emergency Department to Triage Patients With Suspected Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06500468 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Usage of Novel Blood Sensing Capsule in Emergency Department to Triage Patients With Suspected Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

TypeinterventionalSponsorTan Tock Seng HospitalRan2024 to 2026Enrolled84ConditionsBleeding UgiArmsPillSense System
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Drew B SchembreDigestive Health, John Muir Health, Walnut Creek, California, USA DBSCHEMBRE@GMAIL.COM.ORCID 0000-0003-1742-3774
Robson E ElyClinical Transformation, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Janice M ConnollyInternal Medicine, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Kunjali T PadhyaGastroenterology, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Rohit ShardaGastroenterology, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
John J BrandaburGastroenterology, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Swedish Medical Center · USJohn Muir Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score (GBS) was designed to identify patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) who do not require hospitalisation. It may also help stratify patients unlikely to benefit from intensive care.

designWe reviewed patients assigned a GBS in the emergency room (ER) via a semiautomated calculator. Patients with a score ≤7 (low risk) were directed to an unmonitored bed (UMB), while those with a score of ≥8 (high risk) were considered for MB placement. Conformity with guidelines and subsequent transfers to MB were reviewed, along with transfusion requirement, rebleeding, length of stay, need for intervention and death.

resultsOver 34 months, 1037 patients received a GBS in the ER. 745 had an UGIB. 235 (32%) of these patients had a GBS ≤7. 29 (12%) low-risk patients were admitted to MBs. Four low-risk patients admitted to UMB required transfer to MB within the first 48 hours. Low-risk patients admitted to UMBs were no more likely to die, rebleed, need transfusion or require more endoscopic, radiographic or surgical procedures than those admitted to MBs. No low-risk patient died from GIB. Patients with GBS ≥8 were more likely to rebleed, require transfusion and interventions to control bleeding but not to die.

conclusionA semiautomated GBS calculator can be incorporated into an ER workflow. Patients with a GBS ≤7 are unlikely to need MB care for UGIB. Further studies are warranted to determine an ideal scoring system for MB admission.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalGastrointestinal HemorrhageBlood TransfusionHumansRisk AssessmentSeverity of Illness Indexbleedingendoscopygastrointestinal bleedinggastrointestinal haemorrhagehealth economics

Identifiers

PMID33214231
PMCPMC7681917
OpenAlexW3106151722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.