ArticleClinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)2021
Neurocognitive measures predict voluntary stepping performance in older adults post-hip fracture.
Article in Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of Maitland and Mulligan mobilization methods for adults with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHip fracture is a debilitating injury, especially in older adults. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationships between Trail-Making test performance and parameters of the choice stepping reaction time test in community-dwelling older adults after hip fracture.
methodsTwenty-four older adults post-hip fracture repair participated in an ancillary study for physical therapy interventions. Measures included Trail-Making test (Parts A & B) scores, movement time (time from foot liftoff to touchdown), step speed, reaction time (time from cue to foot liftoff), and total response time (time from step cue to touchdown) in the forward and lateral directions. Paired t-tests and multiple linear regressions were used for analysis.
findingsSignificant differences were found in movement time, speed and reaction time between limbs in the lateral direction, and in movement and reaction time in the forward direction. Trails A predicted step speed, reaction time and total response time for the fractured limb in the lateral direction, as well as reaction time and total response time in the forward direction. However, Trails A could not predict performance for the non-fractured limb. Trails B predicted stepping performance for both limbs in the forward and lateral directions.
interpretationTrails A correlated with the fractured limb's ability to perform the choice stepping test, but not in the non-fractured limb. Meanwhile, Trails B correlated with stepping performance in both limbs, suggesting those with poorer executive function have a lower protective stepping capability and may be at a higher risk for future falls and injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.