Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33213849›Full record

SynthesisThrombosis research2020

Drug-drug interactions with direct oral anticoagulants associated with adverse events in the real world: A systematic review.

Allen Li, Ming K Li, Mark Crowther, Sara R Vazquez

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Thrombosis research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Rivaroxaban use during vitamin KResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Allen LiUniversity of Ottawa, Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, ON, Canada. Electronic address: lia59@mcmaster.ca.
Ming K LiUniversity of Toronto, Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, ON, Canada. Electronic address: mingml.li@mail.utoronto.ca.
Mark CrowtherDivision of Hematology & Thromboembolism, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. Electronic address: crowthrm@mcmaster.ca.
Sara R VazquezDepartment of Pharmacy Services, Thrombosis Service, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, United States. Electronic address: Sara.vazquez@hsc.utah.edu.
McMaster University · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDirect oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as safe and effective alternatives to Vitamin-K antagonists for treatment and prevention of arterial and venous thrombosis. Due to their novelty, pharmacokinetic DOAC drug-drug interactions (DDIs) that result in clinical adverse events have not been well-documented.

objectiveThis study aims to systematically review reported pharmacokinetic DDIs resulting in clinical adverse events through documented observational evidence to better inform clinicians in clinical practice.

methodsA comprehensive literature review of EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Ovid HealthStar was conducted through March 10th, 2020. Two independent reviewers screened and extracted data from eligible articles according to pre-established inclusion and exclusion criteria. Articles reporting bleeding or thrombotic outcomes in non-controlled (observational) settings resulting from suggested pharmacokinetic DOAC DDIs were included.

resultsA total of 5567 citations were reviewed, of which 24 were included following data extraction. The majority were case reports (n = 21) documenting a single adverse event resulting from a suspected DOAC DDI, while the remaining papers were a case series (n = 1) and cohort studies (n = 2). The most commonly reported interacting drugs were amiodarone and ritonavir (bleeding), and phenobarbital, phenytoin, and carbamazepine (thrombosis). Bleeding events more often resulted from a combined mechanism (P-glycoprotein AND CYP3A4 inhibition), whereas thrombotic events resulted from either combined OR single P-glycoprotein/CYP3A4 induction.

conclusionCurrent literature evaluating the real-world risk of DOAC DDIs is limited to few case reports and retrospective observational analyses. Clinicians are encouraged to continue to report suspected drug interactions resulting in adverse events.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsPharmaceutical PreparationsAdministration, OralDrug InteractionsHemorrhageHumansObservational Studies as TopicRetrospective StudiesAnticoagulantsPharmaceutical PreparationsAdverse eventBleedingDirect oral anticoagulantDrug interactionThromboembolismThrombosis

Identifiers

PMID33213849
PMCPMC7417902
OpenAlexW3048714313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.