Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33213522›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2020

Antimicrobial use and production system shape the fecal, environmental, and slurry resistomes of pig farms.

Oscar Mencía-Ares, Raúl Cabrera-Rubio, José Francisco Cobo-Díaz, Avelino Álvarez-Ordóñez, Manuel Gómez-García, Héctor Puente, Paul D Cotter, Fiona Crispie, Ana Carvajal, Pedro Rubio and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Microbial genomics · 2024
    Article
  12. Genomic characterization of a clonal emergentApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Resistome in the indoor dust samples from workplaces and households: a pilot study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Oscar Mencía-AresDepartment of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary, Universidad de León, León, Spain.
Raúl Cabrera-RubioTeagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland.
José Francisco Cobo-DíazDepartment of Food Hygiene and Technology, Faculty of Veterinary, Universidad de León, León, Spain.
Avelino Álvarez-OrdóñezDepartment of Food Hygiene and Technology, Faculty of Veterinary, Universidad de León, León, Spain.
Manuel Gómez-GarcíaDepartment of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary, Universidad de León, León, Spain.
Héctor PuenteDepartment of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary, Universidad de León, León, Spain.
Paul D CotterTeagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland.
Fiona CrispieTeagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland.
Ana CarvajalDepartment of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary, Universidad de León, León, Spain. ana.carvajal@unileon.es.ORCID 0000-0001-8961-636X
Pedro RubioDepartment of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary, Universidad de León, León, Spain.
Héctor ArgüelloDepartment of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary, Universidad de León, León, Spain.
Universidad de León · ESTeagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe global threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a One Health problem impacted by antimicrobial use (AMU) for human and livestock applications. Extensive Iberian swine production is based on a more sustainable and eco-friendly management system, providing an excellent opportunity to evaluate how sustained differences in AMU impact the resistome, not only in the animals but also on the farm environment. Here, we evaluate the resistome footprint of an extensive pig farming system, maintained for decades, as compared to that of industrialized intensive pig farming by analyzing 105 fecal, environmental and slurry metagenomes from 38 farms.

resultsOur results evidence a significantly higher abundance of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) on intensive farms and a link between AMU and AMR to certain antimicrobial classes. We observed differences in the resistome across sample types, with a higher richness and dispersion of ARGs within environmental samples than on those from feces or slurry. Indeed, a deeper analysis revealed that differences among the three sample types were defined by taxa-ARGs associations. Interestingly, mobilome analyses revealed that the observed AMR differences between intensive and extensive farms could be linked to differences in the abundance of mobile genetic elements (MGEs). Thus, while there were no differences in the abundance of chromosomal-associated ARGs between intensive and extensive herds, a significantly higher abundance of integrons in the environment and plasmids, regardless of the sample type, was detected on intensive farms.

conclusionsOverall, this study shows how AMU, production system, and sample type influence, mainly through MGEs, the profile and dispersion of ARGs in pig production. Video Abstract.

Indexed as

Environmental MicrobiologyFarmsAnimalsAnimals, DomesticAnti-Infective AgentsDrug Resistance, MicrobialFecesGenes, BacterialMetagenomeSwineAnti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial resistanceFarm environmentFecesMobilomeOne healthSustainable farmingSwine

Identifiers

PMID33213522
PMCPMC7678069
OpenAlexW3105189115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.