Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33213480›Full record

SynthesisJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2020

Pin vs plate fixation for metacarpal fractures: a meta-analysis.

Xiangting Zhu, Hongwei Zhang, Jingying Wu, Shiwei Wang, Lin Miao

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Compari̇son of closed reducti̇on percutaneous pi̇nni̇ng vs. open reducti̇on plate-screw fi̇xati̇on techni̇ques i̇n unstable metacarpal shaft fractures.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiangting ZhuDepartment of Orthopedics, Zaozhuang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2666 Taihangshan Road, Zaozhuang, 277000, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Hongwei ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics, Zaozhuang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2666 Taihangshan Road, Zaozhuang, 277000, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Jingying WuDepartment of Emergency, Zaozhuang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zaozhuang, 277000, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Shiwei WangDepartment of Operation Room, Zaozhuang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zaozhuang, 277000, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Lin MiaoDepartment of Orthopedics, Zaozhuang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2666 Taihangshan Road, Zaozhuang, 277000, Shandong, People's Republic of China. miaolindr@sina.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5944-2143
Zaozhuang Municipal Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe differences in the clinical and functional outcomes of closed reduction and percutaneous pin fixation and open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) using plate and screws have been systematically synthesized by one meta-analysis. With newer studies being published, an effort to update the earlier meta-analysis is necessary.

methodsComprehensive searches were done systematically through PubMed, Scopus, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and Google scholar databases. Randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, prospective comparative non-randomized studies, and even studies reporting findings from retrospective chart review were eligible to be included. Statistical analysis was done using STATA version 13.0. GRADE assessment was done to assess the quality of pooled evidence.

resultsA total of 9 studies were included. The pooled estimates did not suggest any significant differences in the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score [WMD - 0.77; 95% CI, - 3.55, 2.00; I

conclusionNo significant long-term differences were noted in the functional outcomes suggesting that both these techniques are comparable. The choice of modality should be made based on the skills and preference of the surgeon and availability of resources.

Indexed as

Bone NailsBone PlatesAdultClosed Fracture ReductionFemaleFractures, BoneHumansMaleMetacarpal BonesMetacarpophalangeal JointOpen Fracture ReductionRange of Motion, ArticularRecovery of FunctionTreatment OutcomeMeta-analysisMetacarpal fracturesOpen reduction with internal fixationPercutaneous pin fixation

Identifiers

PMID33213480
PMCPMC7678208
OpenAlexW3100491934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.