Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33213479›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2020

Molecular forms of Anopheles subpictus and Anopheles sundaicus in the Indian subcontinent.

Ankita Sindhania, Manoj K Das, Gunjan Sharma, Sinnathamby N Surendran, B R Kaushal, Himanshu P Lohani, Om P Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Taxonomy, Bio-Ecology and Insecticide Resistance of Anopheline Vectors of Malaria in Sri Lanka.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ankita SindhaniaNational Institute of Malaria Research, Sector 8 Dwarka, New Delhi, 110077, India.
Manoj K DasNational Institute of Malaria Research, Field Unit, Itki, Ranchi, 835301, India.
Gunjan SharmaNational Institute of Malaria Research, Sector 8 Dwarka, New Delhi, 110077, India.
Sinnathamby N SurendranDepartment of Zoology, University of Jaffna, Jaffna, 40000, Sri Lanka.
B R KaushalDepartment of Zoology, Kumaun University, Nainital, India.
Himanshu P LohaniDepartment of Zoology, Kumaun University, Nainital, India.
Om P SinghNational Institute of Malaria Research, Sector 8 Dwarka, New Delhi, 110077, India. singh@nimr.org.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5135-6654

Funding

Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology SR/WOS-B/698/2016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnopheles subpictus and Anopheles sundaicus are closely related species, each comprising several sibling species. Ambiguities exist in the classification of these two nominal species and the specific status of members of these species complexes. Identifying fixed molecular forms and mapping their spatial distribution will help in resolving the taxonomic ambiguities and understanding their relative epidemiological significance.

methodsDNA sequencing of Internal Transcribed Spacer-2 (ITS2), 28S-rDNA (D1-to-D3 domains) and cytochrome oxidase-II (COII) of morphologically identified specimens of two nominal species, An. subpictus sensu lato (s.l.) and An. sundaicus s.l., collected from the Indian subcontinent, was performed and subjected to genetic distance and molecular phylogenetic analyses.

resultsMolecular characterization of mosquitoes for rDNA revealed the presence of two molecular forms of An. sundaicus s.l. and three molecular forms of An. subpictus s.l. (provisionally designated as Form A, B and C) in the Indian subcontinent. Phylogenetic analyses revealed two distinct clades: (i) subpictus clade, with a single molecular form of An. subpictus (Form A) prevalent in mainland India and Sri Lanka, and (ii) sundaicus clade, comprising of members of Sundaicus Complex, two molecular forms of An. subpictus s.l. (Form B and C), prevalent in coastal areas or islands in Indian subcontinent, and molecular forms of An. subpictus s.l. reported from Thailand and Indonesia. Based on the number of float-ridges on eggs, all An. subpictus molecular Form B were classified as Species B whereas majority (80%) of the molecular Form A were classified as sibling species C. Fixed intragenomic sequence variation in ITS2 with the presence of two haplotypes was found in molecular Form A throughout its distribution.

conclusionA total of three molecular forms of An. subpictus s.l. and two molecular forms of An. sundaicus s.l. were recorded in the Indian subcontinent. Phylogenetically, two forms of An. subpictus s.l. (Form B and C) prevalent in coastal areas or islands in the Indian subcontinent and molecular forms reported from Southeast Asia are members of Sundaicus Complex. Molecular Form A of An. subpictus is distantly related to all other forms and deserve a distinct specific status.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnophelesDNA, Ribosomal SpacerElectron Transport Complex IVFemaleIndiaMalariaMosquito VectorsPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 28SSpecies SpecificitySri LankaDNA, Ribosomal SpacerElectron Transport Complex IVRNA, Ribosomal, 28SAnopheles subpictusAnopheles sundaicusPhylogeneticsRibosomal DNASibling speciesSpecies complex

Identifiers

PMID33213479
PMCPMC7678295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.