Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33213448›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2020

Support practices by an interdisciplinary team in a palliative-care unit for relatives of patients in agonal phase.

M Mélin, H Amieva, M Frasca, C Ouvrard, V Berger, H Hoarau, C Roumiguière, B Paternostre, N Stadelmaier, N Raoux and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

M MélinPalliative Care Service, Universitary Hospital Center Bordeaux, 1, rue Jean Burguet, 33075, Bordeaux, France. maider.melin@chu-bordeaux.fr.
H AmievaInserm 1219 Psycho-epidemiology of Aging and Chronic Diseases - Population Health Research Center-ISPED-University Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
M FrascaPalliative Care Service, Universitary Hospital Center Bordeaux, 1, rue Jean Burguet, 33075, Bordeaux, France.
C OuvrardInserm 1219 Psycho-epidemiology of Aging and Chronic Diseases - Population Health Research Center-ISPED-University Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
V BergerURISH, Universitary Hospital Center Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
H HoarauURISH, Universitary Hospital Center Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
C RoumiguièrePalliative Care Service, Universitary Hospital Center Bordeaux, 1, rue Jean Burguet, 33075, Bordeaux, France.
B PaternostrePalliative Care Service, Universitary Hospital Center Bordeaux, 1, rue Jean Burguet, 33075, Bordeaux, France.
N StadelmaierBergonié Institute, Bordeaux, France.
N RaouxInserm 1219 Psycho-epidemiology of Aging and Chronic Diseases - Population Health Research Center-ISPED-University Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
V BerguaInserm 1219 Psycho-epidemiology of Aging and Chronic Diseases - Population Health Research Center-ISPED-University Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
B BurucoaPalliative Care Service, Universitary Hospital Center Bordeaux, 1, rue Jean Burguet, 33075, Bordeaux, France.
Bordeaux Population Health · FRInserm · FRInstitut Bergonié · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the absence of extant recommendations, the aim of this study was to formalise support practices used by an interdisciplinary team in a palliative-care unit (PCU) for the relatives of patients in the agonal phase preceding death. The secondary objective was to understand the expectations of relatives during this phase in terms of the support provided by professionals and volunteers.

methodsThirty-two people took part in this study; all were interviewed through focus groups (FGs). Each FG comprised one category of individuals working in the PCU: nurses, care- assistants, doctors, psychologists, other professionals, palliative-care volunteers, and relatives. Groups were surveyed using an interview guide, and the interviews were recorded and transcribed to enable identification and characterization of all practices. Care practices were classified into four categories: current consensual practices (i.e. performed by all team members), occasional consensual practices, non-consensual practices (performed by one or a few participants), and practices to be developed.

resultsIn total, 215 practices were mentioned by professionals and palliative-care volunteers: 150 current consensual practices, 48 occasional consensual practices, 1 non-consensual practice, 16 practices yet to be developed, and 29 practices for relatives. Many practices were mentioned by different categories of participants; thus, after cross-checking, the number of practices decreased from 215 to 52. A list of practices deemed desirable by all was drawn up and then validated by the entire interprofessional team. These practices were organised around four themes: providing care and ensuring comfort; communicating, informing, and explaining; interacting; and mobilising interdisciplinary skills.

conclusionsThese results underline the importance of the quality of care provided to patients, the attention given to the relatives themselves, and they highlight the importance of the helping relationship. Following this study, which established a list of varied practices aimed at supporting the relatives of patients in agonal phase, it will be important to set up a broader study seeking to establish a consensus on these practices with an interprofessional group of experts from other PCUs using broad surveys and an adapted methodology. Such studies will make it possible to develop training modules for teams working with relatives.

Indexed as

AdultAttitude to DeathFamilyFemaleFocus GroupsFranceHumansMaleMental Health ServicesMiddle AgedPalliative CarePatient Care TeamQualitative ResearchAgonyInterdisciplinarityPalliative careRelativesSupport practices

Identifiers

PMID33213448
PMCPMC7678093
OpenAlexW3105750289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.