Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33213290›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc2021

Influence of species of negative control sera on results of a brucellosis fluorescence polarization assay.

Steven C Olsen, Lauren S Crawford, Antonio Fuentes, Miladin Kostovic, Paola M Boggiatto

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Steven C OlsenBacterial Diseases of Livestock Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Ames, IA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4136-3831
Lauren S CrawfordBacterial Diseases of Livestock Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Ames, IA.
Antonio FuentesMontana Department of Livestock, Montana Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Bozeman, MT.
Miladin KostovicEllie LLC, Germantown, WI.
Paola M BoggiattoBacterial Diseases of Livestock Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Ames, IA.
Agricultural Research Service · USMontana Department of Transportation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated serologic responses of cattle, bison, elk, and swine representing negative control, early vaccination (4-8 wk), late vaccination (21-28 wk) or booster vaccination, early after-experimental challenge (2-4 wk), and late after-experimental challenge (8-21 wk), in a brucellosis fluorescence polarization assay (FPA;

Indexed as

BisonDeerAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialBrucella abortusBrucella VaccineBrucellosisCattleCattle DiseasesFluorescence PolarizationMilkSensitivity and SpecificitySwineVaccinationAntibodies, BacterialBrucella VaccinebisonBrucella abortuscattleelkfluorescence polarization assayswine

Identifiers

PMID33213290
PMCPMC7758695
OpenAlexW3105143541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.